Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Can you tell me if my answer is correct? It's another exercise suggested in my lecture notes.

Exercise: Consider $C[-1,1]$ with the sup norm $\|\cdot\|_\infty$. Let $$ W = \{f \in C[-1,1] \mid \int_0^1 f d\mu = \int_{-1}^0 f d \mu = 0 \}$$

Show that $W$ is a closed subspace. Let $f(x) = x$ and calculate $\|f\|_{V/W} = \inf_{w \in W} \|f + w \|_\infty$ and show that the infimum is not achieved.

My answer:

To show that $W$ is closed we show that if $f$ is a limit point of $W$ then $f \in W$. So let $f$ be a limit point. Then there is a sequence $w_n \in W$ converging to $f$, i.e. for $\varepsilon > 0$ there is $w_n$ such that $\|f - w_n\|_\infty < \varepsilon$. Hence for $\varepsilon > 0$, $\int_{0}^1 f d \mu = \int_0^1 (f + w_n - w_n ) d \mu \leq \int_0^1 |f-w_n| + \int_0^1 w_n = \int_0^1 |f-w_n| \leq \|f-w_n\|_\infty \leq \varepsilon$. Let $\varepsilon \to 0$. Same argument for $[-1,0]$.

Now we compute the norm: $$ \|x\|_{V/W} = \inf_{w \in W} \|x + w\|_\infty = \inf_{w \in W} \sup_{x \in [-1,1]} |x + w(x)|$$

$\|x + w\|_\infty$ is smallest for $w(x) = -x$. But $-x \notin W$.

I'm not so sure about the second part. Is this what is meant by showing that the infimum is not achieved? "$\|x + w\|$ is smallest for $w(x) = -x$" seems a bit... wobbly. Thanks for your help.

share|improve this question
1  
Make up your post it is full of mistakes and typos, which I think your see –  userNaN Jul 9 '12 at 9:08
    
@Norbert The only mistake I can spot on this page is in your comment. I have taken a screen shot in case I need evidence in the future. –  Rudy the Reindeer Jul 9 '12 at 9:18
1  
When you are proving $f\in W$ you are talking about $w_n$. What is $w$? Why don't you write limits of integration? And why $\Vert f+w\Vert_\infty\leq\varepsilon$. You only assumed that $\Vert f-w_n\Vert_\infty<\varepsilon$. –  userNaN Jul 9 '12 at 9:24
2  
This is the only way not to make mistakes, when you have no intuition in new subject. Well my comments are boring but I think they are necessary when you study FA for the first time. –  userNaN Jul 9 '12 at 9:32
1  
Not at all. By the way you can prove that $W$ is closed by the following way. $W$ is an intersection of kernels of continuous functionals $I_1(f)=\int_0^1 f d\mu$, $I_2(f)=\int_{-1}^0 f d\mu$. It is known that kernels of continuous functionals are closed, then does $W$ as intersection of closed sets. –  userNaN Jul 9 '12 at 9:39

2 Answers 2

up vote 4 down vote accepted

Your idea for the first part is correct but the inequalities you write are odd. Try $$ \left|\,\int_0^1f\,\right|=\left|\int_0^1(f-w_n)\right|\leqslant\int_0^1|f-w_n|\leqslant\|f-w_n\|_\infty\to0, $$ and similarly for the interval $[-1,0]$.

Regarding the second part, one would like to use the function $w_0:x\mapsto x-\frac12\mathrm{sgn}(x)$ to approximate $u:x\mapsto x$ but, despite the fact that $\int\limits_{-1}^0w_0=\int\limits_0^1w_0=0$, one cannot because $w_0$ is not continuous at zero. Hence $w_0$ is not in $W$ but the task is to show that $w_0$ indeed provides the infimum $\|u\|_{V/W}$.

Note that $u(x)-w_0(x)=-\frac12\mathrm{sgn}(x)$ for every $x$ hence $\|u-w_0\|_\infty=\frac12$. Call $W_0\supset W$ the set of integrable functions $w$ such that $\int\limits_{-1}^0w=\int\limits_0^1w=0$. For every $w$ in $W_0$, $\int\limits_0^1(u-w)=\frac12$ hence there exists some $x\geqslant0$ such that $u(x)-w(x)\geqslant\frac12$. This proves that $\|u-w\|_\infty\geqslant\frac12$ for every $w$ in $W_0$, and in particular for every $w$ in $W$, hence $\|u\|_{V/W}\geqslant\frac12$.

Furthermore, for any $w$ in $W$, the condition $\|u-w\|_\infty=\frac12$ implies that $u(x)-w(x)\leqslant\frac12$ for every $x$ in $[0,1]$. Since $\int\limits_0^1(u-w)=\frac12$ and $u-w$ is continuous, $u(x)-w(x)=\frac12$ for every $x$ in $[0,1]$. Likewise, $u(x)-w(x)=-\frac12$ for every $x$ in $[-1,0]$. These two conditions are incompatible at $x=0$ hence there is no function $w$ in $W$ such that $\|u-w\|_\infty=\frac12$.

Finally, one can modify $w_0$ to get some function $w_\varepsilon$ in $W$ such that $\|u-w_\varepsilon\|_\infty\leqslant\|u-v\|_\infty+\varepsilon$ hence $\|u\|_{V/W}=\frac12$. For example, one can consider the unique $w_\varepsilon$ in $W$ which is affine on $x\leqslant-\varepsilon$ and on $x\geqslant\varepsilon$ and such that $w_\varepsilon(x)=-x/(2\varepsilon)$ on $|x|\leqslant\varepsilon$.

Edit: For the last step, one could try to use the approximation of $w_0$ by its Fourier series, that is, to consider $w_n(x)=-\sum\limits_{k=1}^n\frac{\sin(2k\pi x)}{\pi k}$. Unfortunately, due to Gibbs phenomenon, this choice leads to $\|w_n-u\|_\infty$ converging to $\frac12+a$ where $a\approx0.089490$, instead of the desired limit $\frac12$.

share|improve this answer
    
Thank you for this answer, did. I guess the main problem is to see that $\|u\|_{V/W} = \frac12$. How did you see that? I don't know how to see from $$\inf_{w\in W} \sup_{x \in [-1,1]} |x - w(x)|$$ that $w(x)$ should be $x - \frac{1}{2} \operatorname{sgn}{(x)}$. –  Rudy the Reindeer Jul 9 '12 at 11:03
1  
Here is how. Since $u$ is discontinuous at $0$, I first tried to determine the best possible $w$ on $(-1,0)$ with integral $0$ and the best possible $w$ on $(0,1)$ one with integral $0$. For example, if $w\geqslant u-c$ on $(0,1)$ with $c\lt\frac12$, there is no chance the integral of $w$ on $(0,1)$ can be $0$. Once I got those two functions $w$, I saw they were not making a continuous function on (-1,1)$... et voilà. –  Did Jul 9 '12 at 14:35
    
Merci! I assume you mean $w_0$ at the beginning of your second sentence. Before I got your comment I'd asked Jonas in chat how to see $\|u\|_{V/W}$ and he said that it's "obvious" if you know the Dirichlet conditions. Which I did not know, of course. –  Rudy the Reindeer Jul 10 '12 at 5:32

Here is an explicit sequence of functions that approaches the infimum:

Let $\phi_{-}(f) = \int_{-1}^0 f$, $\phi_{+}(f) = \int_0^{1} f$. (Both $\phi_{-}$ and $\phi_{+}$ are continuous, hence $W = \phi_{-}^{-1}\{0\} \cap \phi_{+}^{-1} \{0\}$ is closed.)

Now consider the sequence of functions $$w_n(x) = \left\{ \begin{array}{ll} x-\frac{1}{2}-\alpha_n & \mbox{if } x \in [\frac{1}{n},1] \\ (\frac{1}{n}-\frac{1}{2}-\alpha_n)nx & \mbox{if } x \in [0,\frac{1}{n}] \\ -w_n(-x) & \mbox{if } x \in [-1,0) \end{array} \right.$$ A rather tedious calculation shows that to have $\phi_{+}(w_n)=0$ (and hence $\phi_{-}(w_n)=0$, by oddness), I need to pick $\alpha_n = \frac{1}{4 n -2}$. Furthermore, it is clear that $\|f-w_n\|_{\infty} = \frac{1}{2}+\alpha_n$, from which it follows that $\inf_{w \in W} \|f-w\|_{\infty} = \frac{1}{2}$.

share|improve this answer
    
Nice, thank you copper.hat. I'll read it in more detail later, I'm working on something else right now. –  Rudy the Reindeer Jul 19 '12 at 9:23

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.