Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Let $c$ be an integer, not necessarily positive and not a square. Let $R=\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{c}]$ denote the set of numbers of the form $$a+b\sqrt{c}, a,b \in \mathbb{Z}.$$ Then $R$ is a subring of $\mathbb{C}$ under the usual addition and multiplication.

My question is: if $R$ is a UFD (unique factorization domain), does it follow that it is also a PID (principal ideal domain)?

share|improve this question
add comment

3 Answers

up vote 5 down vote accepted

Yes, because such quadratic number rings are easily shown to have dimension at most one (i.e. every nonzero prime ideal is maximal). But $\rm PID\:$s are precisely the $\rm UFD\:$s having dimension $\le 1\:.\ $ Below is a sketch of a proof of this and closely related results.

THEOREM $\rm\ \ \ TFAE\ $ for a $\rm UFD\ D$
$1)\ $ prime ideals are maximal if nonzero
$2)\ $ prime ideals are principal
$3)\ $ maximal ideals are principal
$4)\ \rm\ gcd(a,b) = 1\ \Rightarrow\ (a,b) = 1$
$5)\ $ $\rm D$ is Bezout
$6)\ $ $\rm D$ is a $\rm PID$

Proof $\ $ (sketch of $1 \Rightarrow 2 \Rightarrow 3 \Rightarrow 4 \Rightarrow 5 \Rightarrow 6 \Rightarrow 1$)

$1\Rightarrow 2)$ $\rm\ \ P\supset (p)\ \Rightarrow\ P = (p)$
$2\Rightarrow 3)$ $\ \: $ Clear.
$3\Rightarrow 4)$ $\ \ \rm (a,b) \subsetneq P = (p)\ $ so $\rm\ (a,b) = 1$
$4\Rightarrow 5)$ $\ \ \rm c = \gcd(a,b)\ \Rightarrow\ (a,b) = c\ (a/c,b/c) = (c)$
$5\Rightarrow 6)$ $\ \ \rm 0 \ne I \subset D\:$ Bezout is generated by an elt with the least number of prime factors
$6\Rightarrow 1)$ $\ \ \rm P \supset (p),\ a \not\in (p)\ \Rightarrow\ (a,p) = (1)\ \Rightarrow\ P = (p)$

share|improve this answer
    
I am not able to understand your 4th condition. I am confused by the notations. What exactly do you want to say. –  anonymous Jan 20 '11 at 9:51
    
@Chandru1: $\rm\ (a,b) = 1$ means the ideal generated by $\rm\ a,\:b\ $ is the whole ring, i.e. $\rm\ a\ d + b\ c = 1\ $ for some $\rm\ c,\: d\ \in D\:.\ $ $\rm\ \gcd(a,b) = 1\ $ means $\rm\ d\ |\ a,\:b\ \Rightarrow\ d\:|\:1\:.$ –  Bill Dubuque Jan 20 '11 at 14:15
add comment

The answer is yes. The argument is as follows: if $R$ is a UFD, then it is necessarily integrally closed in its fraction field $K = \mathbb Q(\sqrt{c})$, and thus is equal to the full ring of algebraic integers in $K$. A general fact about such full rings of algebraic integers is that if they are UFDs then they are PIDs, the reason being that in these rings, one always has the unique factorization of non-zero ideals into prime ideals, and it is not hard to see that the UFD property forces prime ideals (and hence any product of prime ideals) to be principal.

share|improve this answer
    
Dear Matt E Maybe I could impose for some pedagogical advice. I'm a 68 year old self-studier, no math education, starting two years ago. I love algebra and what little I know of algebraic number theory. I have often seen your kind and highly informative remarks. E.g., here I am familiar with all the terms used, but am not remotely capable of putting them together as such. I would be privileged if you gave me some advice as to a book/study regime to get some control of the material. I apologize if this is not an appropriate question or venue in which to ask. Thanks very much. Regards –  Andrew Feb 10 '13 at 15:51
    
Dear Matt E Please forgive me for you adding to this imposition, but maybe I could also mention I post I wrote to a question that is most relevant. This is such a big part of my life. meta.math.stackexchange.com/questions/2606/… –  Andrew Feb 11 '13 at 18:30
    
@Andrew: Dear Andrew, Thanks for the kind words. I posted some comments under your meta post which might be of some help. It's normal that the arguments you can work out for yourself lag a long way behind the arguments of others that you can read, but I think working through exercises in a good undergrad algebra book would be a way to improve. As I wrote in my other comments, Dummit and Foote has many good exercises (as far as I remember), especially on Galois theory and related topics, which are good background for the kind of number theory you seem to be interested in. Best wishes, –  Matt E Feb 12 '13 at 6:26
add comment

Yes. If it is a UFD, then it is integrally closed, hence it is a Dedekind domain because it is of dimension one (being contained in the integral closure of $\mathbb{Z}$ in some finite extension of $\mathbb{Q}$). A Dedekind domain is a UFD iff it is a PID: indeed, this is equivalent to every non-zero prime being principal. (A noetherian domain is a UFD iff every height one prime is principal. So if a Dedekind domain is a UFD, then all its primes are principal, so by factorization of ideals, every ideal is principal.)

A simple example of a UFD that is not a PID is the polynomial ring $\mathbb{C}[x,y]$.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.