Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Fix $n \geq 1$ and let $B$ denote a triangulated closed $n$-ball. Let $D$ be a subset of the boundary of $B^n$ that is homeomorphic to the closed $(n-1)$-ball and such that is properly triangulated by the same triangulation as well.

I would like to compute the Betti numbers of $B$ relative to $D$. I have tried to regard the long exact sequence on homology of the chain complexes, and that the $0$-th homology is trivial as it is isomorphic to the $0$-th homology group of the de-Rham complex. Is it correct that all Betti number of $B$ relative to $D$ vanish?

I am not used to algebraic topology, and need the result only in a secondary (if even that) context. I could use a reference which clarifies under which circumstances to use the long exact sequence on homology in the context of simplicial complexes.

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 1 down vote accepted

Yes, you can use the long exact sequence of relative homology. In fact, both the ball and the disk are contractible so they only have nonzero homology in degree 0, and there the inclusion is an isomorphism on homology. Examining the long exact sequence, this is enough to conclude that the relative homology is always zero. (So the Betti numbers all vanish.)

You can also see this by noting that there is a homotopy equivalence between the pair (Ball,disk) and (Disk, Disk) essentially by crushing the non-disk parts of the ball down onto the boundary disk. Then your statement holds by the homotopy invariance of homology.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.