Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

It is known that : If $\lim_{x \to \infty} \sum_{i=1}^n f_i(x)=0$ and $f_i$ are real-valued periodic function, then $\sum_{i=1}^n f_i(x)=0$ for all $x \in \mathbb{R}$. We can solve this problem by repeatedly using the difference operator $ \Delta_a:(x \rightarrow f(x))\rightarrow (x\rightarrow f(x+a)-f(x))$ and the linearity of this operator.

I try to extend this result to sum of series of periodic function. If $ \lim_{x \to \infty}\sum_{i=1}^{\infty} f_i(x)=0$ and $f_i$ are periodic functions, I want to know under what conditions we can get $\sum_{i=1}^{\infty} f_i(x)=0$.

It is shown in this post that if $f_i$ are merely continuous then the result is not true. On the other hand, I found that if $\sum_{i=k+1}^{\infty}\lVert f_i\rVert =o(2^{-k})$, then the result is true.

Is it true that if the periods of $f_i$ are bounded (i.e. there exist a constant $M$ s.t. $M>\mbox{period of }f_i$ for all $i$) and $\lim_{x \to \infty}\sum_{i=1}^{\infty} f_i(x)=0$, then $\sum_{i=1}^{\infty} f_i(x)=0$?

Besides, if $\sum f_i$ is uniformly convergent and $\lim_{x \rightarrow \infty}\sum_{i=1}^{\infty} f_i(x)=0$, will we have $\sum_{i=1}^{\infty} f_i(x)=0$?

share|cite|improve this question

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.