Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Let $f:\mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow\mathbb{R}$ be a convex function. For $t\in\mathbb{R}$, consider the corresponding level set $$f^{-1}\{t\}=\{(x,y)\in\mathbb{R}^2: f(x,y)=t\}.$$

For the application I have in mind, it will suffice to assume that all the level sets of $f$ are compact curves. In that case, denoting arc length measure on the plane by $\ell(\cdot)$, when does an estimate of the form $$\Big|\ell(f^{-1}\{t\})-\ell(f^{-1}\{t'\})\Big|\leq C |t-t'|^{\delta}$$ hold for some $C<\infty$ and $\delta>0$? And how does the optimal exponent $\delta$ depend on $f$?

The intuition is that the curves $f^{-1}\{t\}$ and $f^{-1}\{t'\}$ should be "close to each other" whenever $t$ is close to $t'$. In which other ways can this be made rigorous?

Thank you.

share|improve this question
    
I haven't fully thought this through, but maybe you can set up a correspondence between the curves $f^{-1}\{t\}$ and $f^{-1}\{t+\mathrm dt\}$ in the normal direction and compare the lengths of infinitesimal segments along those curves. I'd imagine you might be able to derive $\mathrm d\ell/\mathrm dt$ as some kind of integral involving the first and second derivatives of $f$. –  Rahul Jul 4 '12 at 5:12

3 Answers 3

up vote 2 down vote accepted

Here is an approach in terms of "intuitive calculus":

Let $$\gamma_v:\quad s\mapsto z(s)=\bigl(x(s),y(s)\bigr)\qquad(0\leq s\leq L_v)$$ be the arc length parametrization of the level set $f^{-1}(v)$. For each $s$ the tangent vector $\dot\gamma_v(s)$ is orthogonal to the gradient $\nabla f$ at $z(s)$. If we orient $\gamma_v$ such that $\nabla f$ points to the outside we can therefore write $\nabla f\bigl(z(s)\bigr)$ in the form $$\nabla f\bigl(z(s)\bigr)=\rho\bigl(z(s)\bigr)\bigl(\dot y(s),-\dot x(s)\bigr)\ ,\qquad\rho(z):=\bigl|\nabla f(z)\bigr|\ .$$ For an infinitesimal $\epsilon>0$ the level set $\gamma_{v+\epsilon}:=f^{-1}(v+\epsilon)$ has the parametrization $$\gamma_{v+\epsilon}:\quad s\mapsto\Bigl(x(s)+\epsilon{ \dot y(s)\over\rho(z(s))},\ y(s)-\epsilon{ \dot x(s)\over\rho(z(s))}\Bigr)\qquad(0\leq s\leq L_v)\ ,$$ where we have neglected higher order terms in $\epsilon$. Thus we get $$\dot\gamma_{v+\epsilon}(s)\doteq \Bigl(\dot x(s)+\epsilon{ \ddot y\rho-\dot y\dot\rho\over\rho^2},\ \dot y(s)-\epsilon{ \ddot x\rho-\dot x\dot\rho\over\rho^2}\Bigr)$$ and therefore $$\bigl|\dot\gamma_{v+\epsilon}\bigr|\doteq1+2\epsilon{\dot x\ddot y-\ddot x\dot y\over\rho}$$ or $$\bigl|\dot\gamma_{v+\epsilon}(s)\bigr|\doteq 1+\epsilon{\kappa(s)\over\rho(z(s))}\ ,$$ where we have denoted the curvature of $\gamma_v$ by $\kappa$. From this we deduce the following formula for the derivative of $L_v$ with respect to $v$: $${dL_v\over dv}=\int_0^{L_v}{\kappa(s)\over\bigl|\nabla f(z(s))\bigr|}\ ds\ .\qquad(*)$$ Now that we have this formula it seems intuitively pretty obvious: When we let $v$ increase then the length $L_v$ increases most in parts of $\gamma_v$ where the curvature is large, and does not change along straight parts of $\gamma_v$.

The integrand in formula $(*)$ can be expressed in terms of the partial derivatives of $f$. One obtains (see, e.g., Bronstein-Semendjajew) $${dL_v\over dv}=\int_0^{L_v}{f_{xx}f_y^2-2f_{xy}f_xf_y+f_{yy}f_x^2\over (f_x^2+f_y^2)^4}\Biggr|_{z(s)}\ ds\ .$$

share|improve this answer

What follows is the work I've done towards a solution, which is unfortunately far too large for a comment. I can make no guarantee that it goes anywhere.

I'll assume $f$ is $C^1$ and strictly convex. Assuming the level sets are compact curves, they must also be simple since a convex function has at most one local extreme. Consider values $t$ in some neighborhood $U$ of $t_0$ (which we will make as small as needed). Let $\gamma_t:[0,1]\to \mathbb R^2$ be a parametrization of $f^{-1}\{t\}$ and note that $\gamma_t$ is locally the graph of a $C^1$ function of $(t,x)$ or $(t,y)$ for fixed $t$. Thanks to compactness and various theorems in calculus, we have a finite set of $a_i,b_i\in [0,1]$ and $C^1$ functions $$\begin{align} f_{1}&:U\times (a_1,b_1)\to \mathbb R,\\ &\vdots\\ f_{n}&:U\times (a_n,b_n)\to \mathbb R\\ f_{n+1}&:U\times (a_{n+1},b_{n+1})\to \mathbb R\\ &\vdots\\ f_{n+m}&:U\times (a_{n+m},b_{n+m})\to \mathbb R \end{align}$$ such that each $a_i<b_i$, the collection $(a_i,b_i)$ covers $(0,1)$, and there exist $C^1$ functions $x_i,y_i$ which are strictly increasing in $s$ such that $$t\in U,s\in (a_i,b_i)\implies \gamma_t(s)=\begin{cases} (x_i(t,s),f_i(t,x_i(t,s))) &\text{if } 1\leq i\leq n\\ (f_i(t,y_i(t,s)),y_i(t,s)) &\text{if } n<i\leq n+m \end{cases}$$ For notational convenience, assume $$0=a_1< a_2< b_1<a_3<b_2<a_4<b_3<\cdots < b_{n+m}=1$$ i.e. that the intervals are in order, nicely trimmed and non-redundant, which saves us from having to through out/trim intervals and rearrange junk. Furthermore, we can assume that $x_i,y_i$ are affine functions in $s$, at least where their domain does not overlap with that of $x_j,y_j$ for $j>i$, by choosing an appropriate parametrization for $\gamma_t$ (arc length is parametrization-independent). Let $L(t)=\ell(f^{-1}\{t\})$ and $a_{n+m+1}=b_{n+m}=1$. Note that $$\begin{align} L(t)=\ell(\mathrm{im}(\gamma_t)) &= \int_0^1\left\|\frac{d\gamma_t}{ds}\right\|ds\\ &=\sum_{i=1}^{n}\int_{a_i}^{a_{i+1}} \frac{dx_i}{ds}\sqrt{1+\left(\frac{df_i}{dx_i}\right)^2}ds+\sum_{i=n+1}^{n+m}\int_{a_i}^{a_{i+1}} \frac{dy_i}{ds}\sqrt{\left(\frac{df_i}{dy_i}\right)^2+1}ds \end{align}$$ thus $$\begin{align} \frac{dL}{dt} &= \frac{d}{dt}\left(\sum_{i=1}^{n}\int_{a_i}^{a_{i+1}} \frac{dx_i}{ds}\sqrt{1+\left(\frac{df_i}{dx_i}\right)^2}ds+\sum_{i=n+1}^{n+m}\int_{a_i}^{a_{i+1}} \frac{dy_i}{ds}\sqrt{\left(\frac{df_i}{dy_i}\right)^2+1}ds\right)\\ &= \sum_{i=1}^{n}\int_{a_i}^{a_{i+1}} \frac{d}{dt}\left(\frac{dx_i}{ds}\sqrt{1+\left(\frac{df_i}{dx_i}\right)^2}\right)ds+\sum_{i=n+1}^{n+m}\int_{a_i}^{a_{i+1}} \frac{d}{dt}\left(\frac{dy_i}{ds}\sqrt{\left(\frac{df_i}{dy_i}\right)^2+1}\right)ds \end{align}$$ which we can analyze piece-by-piece. Looking at the first integrand, note that $x_i$ is affine in $s$ in the region we care about so $\frac{dx_i}{ds}$ is a positive $C^1$ function $c(t)$. Thus we have $$\begin{align} \frac{d}{dt}\left(\frac{dx_i}{ds}\sqrt{1+\left(\frac{df_i}{dx_i}\right)^2}\right) &= \frac{d^2x_i}{ds dt}\sqrt{1+\left(\frac{df_i}{dx_i}\right)^2}+\frac{dx_i}{ds}\frac{df_i}{dx_i}\frac{d^2f_i}{dx_i dt}\left(1+\left(\frac{df_i}{dx_i}\right)^2\right)^{-1/2}\\ &= \frac{dc}{dt}\sqrt{1+\left(\frac{df_i}{dx_i}\right)^2}+c(t)\frac{df_i}{dx_i}\frac{d^2f_i}{dx_i dt}\left(1+\left(\frac{df_i}{dx_i}\right)^2\right)^{-1/2}\\ \end{align}$$ which maybe we can sort of understand. Additionally, since the region contained in $f^{-1}\{t\}$ is the intersection of a convex set with a plane, it is convex as well thus $f_i$ (which defines part of its boundary) is concave as a function of $x_i$ so $\frac{df_i}{dx_i}$ is decreasing. We can go back and change some of what we did earlier, moving around our choices of $f_i$ to avoid the points on the curve tangent to the axes, which means we miss a set of points of measure $0$ (which doesn't affect the integral) so $\frac{df_i}{dx_i}$ will have constant sign $\sigma_i$, but this could cause some problems. From here, the best approach is probably to try to understand each of the derivatives. The hardest are those with respect to $t$.

share|improve this answer

Suppose $f$ is strictly convex and has its minimum at the origin. We can use polar coordinates $(r,\theta)$, in which the element of length is $ds = \sqrt{dr^2 + r^2 d\theta^2}$. Now along the level curve, $\dfrac{dr}{d\theta} = - \dfrac{f_\theta}{f_r}$ (where subscripts refer to partial derivatives wrt $r$ and $\theta$). The level curve $f(r,\theta) = t$ can be written as $r = R(t,\theta)$, and its length is $$ L = \int_0^{2\pi} \sqrt{\dfrac{f_\theta^2}{f_r^2} + r^2} \ d\theta = \int_0^{2\pi} \sqrt{\dfrac{f_\theta^2(R(t,\theta),\theta)}{f_r^2(R(t,\theta),\theta)} + R(t,\theta)^2}\ d\theta$$ We'd like to differentiate the integrand with respect to $t$ at fixed $\theta$. Note that $$\dfrac{\partial r}{\partial t} = \dfrac{1}{f_r}$$ I get $$ \dfrac{\partial}{\partial t} \sqrt{\dfrac{f_\theta^2}{f_r^2} + r^2} = \frac{1}{f_r} \dfrac{\partial }{\partial r} \sqrt{\dfrac{f_\theta^2}{f_r^2} + r^2} = \left({f_\theta^2}+ r^2 f_r^2\right)^{-1/2} \left( \dfrac{f_\theta}{f_r^2} f_{r\theta} - \dfrac{f_\theta^2}{f_r^3} f_{rr} + r \right) $$ and thus we should have $$ \dfrac{dL}{dt} = \int_0^{2\pi} \left({f_\theta^2}+ r^2 f_r^2\right)^{-1/2} \left( \dfrac{f_\theta}{f_r^2} f_{r\theta} - \dfrac{f_\theta^2}{f_r^3} f_{rr} + r \right)\ d\theta$$ I don't know if it's possible to get useful bounds out of this, but perhaps it's a start.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.