Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Given that $A$ is a square matrix with characteristic polynomial $t^2+1$, is $A$ invertible?

I'm not sure, but this question seems to depend on whether $A$ is over $\mathbb{R}$ or over $\mathbb{C}$. My reasoning is that if $A$ is over $\mathbb{C}$ then $A$ has two distinct eigenvalues $-i$ and $i$ and is diagonalizable. Since it's diagonalization is invertible, $A$ is also invertible.

However if $A$ is over $\mathbb{R}$ then $A$ has no eigenvalues and therefore... I don't know where to go from there.

share|cite|improve this question
A matrix is invertible iff its determinant is nonzero. Can you tell the determinant from the characteristic polynomial? – Chris Eagle Jul 3 '12 at 17:33
If you have already learned Cayley-Hamilton theorem, then you know that $A^2+I=0$, i.e., $A^2=-I$. – Martin Sleziak Jul 3 '12 at 17:36
The constant coefficient of the characteristic polynomial = determinant of $A.$ A non-zero determinant implies the matrix is invertible. – user2468 Jul 3 '12 at 18:38
The invertibility property does not depend on the base field. So if a matrix with real coefficients has a complex inverse, this inverse is in fact real. – Lierre Jul 3 '12 at 19:52
up vote 9 down vote accepted

The eigenvalues of the matrix are all roots of the characteristic polynomial.

A square matrix is invertible if and only if $0$ is not an eigenvalue of the matrix.

Therefore, a square matrix is invertible if and only the constant term of its characteristic polynomial is <fill in the blank>

share|cite|improve this answer
not zero. I get it. It was the fact that the matrix has no real eigenvalues that was throwing me for a loop. But I guess that doesn't matter as long as zero isn't an eigenvalue. – Robert S. Barnes Jul 3 '12 at 18:00
@RobertS.Barnes: Exactly. – Arturo Magidin Jul 3 '12 at 18:00

Yes it is. In fact $A^{-1}=-A$.

share|cite|improve this answer

$A$ is a square matrix and $\det A=1$ so it is invertible.

share|cite|improve this answer

Hint: $\pmatrix{ \hphantom{-}0&1\\ -1&0 }$ is an example of a real matrix with characteristic polynomial $t^2+1$ which is invertible. Its inverse is $\pmatrix{ 0&-1\\ 1&\hphantom{-}0 }$, as you can easily check.

share|cite|improve this answer
I would take some objection to your final paragraph; eigenvalues are defined in terms of eigenvectors, and if you view the matrix as acting on $\mathbb{R}^2$, then it has no eigenvectors (and hence no eigenvalues). – Arturo Magidin Jul 3 '12 at 17:39
I agree. I have deleted the objectionable paragraph. Thank you. – MJD Jul 3 '12 at 17:40
It's not misguided, with the appropriate caveats, and it can be made very precise (e.g., you can "complexify" the vector space to obtain eigenvalues), or you can talk about roots of the characteristic polynomial over an algebraic closure of the field of definition. I just thought that such a categorical statement might be confusing given how eigenvalues are usually introduced. (For that matter, my own phrasing in my question could likewise be misconstrued, so I have just fixed it...) – Arturo Magidin Jul 3 '12 at 17:47

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.