Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I don't know how to write it in $\LaTeX.$ It is a tall skinny bold C. This is the context: A set is defined by: The formula

where $\complement\atop{\smash \scriptstyle i}$ is the thing I don't understand. The $i$ is actually directly underneath the weird $C$ in this case. Can anyone explain what this means?

share|cite|improve this question
Does it look like $$E_f = \{i:{\complement_i} L(x)\ne 0\}$$? (The $\complement$ is \complement.) – MJD Jul 3 '12 at 14:41
Yes! But without the square brackets (not sure why I added those). – 098765 Jul 3 '12 at 14:43
Though it's kind of bolder and taller but that could just be the book. – 098765 Jul 3 '12 at 14:44
Wait.. what would be the $i$th complement of a set then?! – user2468 Jul 3 '12 at 14:45
On page 6 it seems that $\complement_i L(x)$ denotes the $i$-th coefficient of the formal power series $L(x)$. – martini Jul 3 '12 at 15:06
up vote 7 down vote accepted

It's the coefficient operator. It extracts the ith coefficient of the Taylor expansion. This is used a lot in combinatorics with generating functions.

share|cite|improve this answer
Thanks for this. I've just seen it explained on page 3 as well. – 098765 Jul 3 '12 at 15:07
What about the notation $[z^n]f(z)$ to denote the coefficient? – Frank Science Jul 3 '12 at 15:14
@Frank Science : It may happen that a standard notation is not the best one, but the main property that's interesting of a standard notation is that it is 'standard', i.e. everyone uses it and everyone is used to it. Sometimes this is because everyone tends to like it after working for a while in the field where the notation is used. It doesn't mean your idea is good or wrong, just that if you want to make a new notation popular, usually you prove a few things in that field of research that makes the use of this new notation more useful than the previous one. – Patrick Da Silva Jul 3 '12 at 15:18
@PatrickDaSilva It's not mine. I saw it in Don Knuth's books, for example, The Art of Computer Programming, or Concrete Mathematics. – Frank Science Jul 3 '12 at 15:19
@Frank Science : I didn't know. But still, my comment applies ; perhaps people working with generating functions prefer the $\complement$ notation to the $[z^n]f(z)$ notation. – Patrick Da Silva Jul 3 '12 at 18:12

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.