Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

For $A= \mathbb{Z}/2{\mathbb Z}[X]$ ring of polynomials with coefficient in the field $\mathbb{Z}/2{\mathbb Z},$ I need to show that there are infinite number of irreducible polynomials in $A.$

How do I show that? I didn't come to any conclusion. I though of series of polynomials but since it it modulo $2$ they were not suitable.

Any direction?

(And: does any one have a link to a web where I can choose Latex symbols and see how they are written? I had one, but I lost it, and can't find it in Google)

share|improve this question
8  
Hint: mimic a very, very old proof that there are infinitely many primes in some other ring. –  user29743 Jul 3 '12 at 13:17
3  
Others have described a simple existential proof (+1). Another non-constructive one is to prove that finite fields of cardinality $2^n$ exist for all $n$. If you are interested in an infinite family of explicit polynomials, I refer you to an earlier answer of mine (a solution of an exercise from Lidl & Niederreiter). –  Jyrki Lahtonen Jul 3 '12 at 13:20
    
Google for "latex math symbols", perhaps adding the name of the particular symbol you want help on. See also this part of the meta Math FAQ. –  hardmath Jul 3 '12 at 13:28
    
Someone here gave me once alink to a web where I can click the symbols/matrices and it shows as math, "cdg" something. I really liked it. –  Jozef Jul 3 '12 at 13:33
1  
Then there's detexify. You don't even need to search a table -- just draw what you want. –  tomasz Jul 3 '12 at 13:41

2 Answers 2

up vote 10 down vote accepted

A variant of Euclid's proof should work fine. Assume there are only finitely many irreducible polynomials $p_1,...,p_n$ in $A$, and consider the irreducible factors of $\prod_{i=1}^n p_i + 1$.

share|improve this answer
    
Besides showing that none of $p_1,...p_n$ divide the polynomial you build above, Do I need to mention or show something else? –  Jozef Jul 5 '12 at 14:29
    
@Jozef That's really all you need - $\prod p_i + 1$ has an irreducible factor which can't be one of the $p_i$s, so you have a contradiction. –  Cocopuffs Jul 5 '12 at 14:55
    
Cocopuffs what would be different if I was asked to prove the same claim for $\mathbb Z / 3 \mathbb Z[x]$? –  Jozef Jul 5 '12 at 14:58
    
@Jozef Nothing. –  Cocopuffs Jul 5 '12 at 15:47

Besides Euclid's classical method, here's another approach. Recall that the sequence of polynomials $\rm\:f_n = (x^n\!-\!1)/(x\!-\!1)\:$ is a strong divisibility sequence, i.e. $\rm\:(f_m,f_n) = f_{(m,n)}$ in $\rm\mathbb Z[x].\:$ Hence the subsequence with prime indices yields an infinite sequence of pairwise coprime polynomials. Further the linked proof shows the gcd has linear (Bezout) form $\rm\:(f_m,f_n) = f_{(m,n)}\! = g\, f_m + h\, f_n,\,$ $\rm\, g,h\in\mathbb Z[x],\:$ so said coprimality persists mod $2;\,$ indeed $\rm\:(p,q)=1\:$ for primes $\rm\:p\ne q,$ so $$\rm\,mod\ 2\!:\ \ d\:|\:f_p,f_q\ \Rightarrow\ d\:|\:g\,f_p\!+\!h\,f_q = f_{(p,q)}\! = f_1 = 1.\,$$

Thus, for each prime $\rm\:p,\:$ choosing a prime factor of $\rm\:f_p\:$ yields infinitely many prime polynomials mod $2,\,$ none associate (being pairwise coprime). Note that this argument works quite generally.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.