Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Given a number field $\mathbb{Q}[\beta]$, where the minimal polynomial of $\beta$ in $\mathbb[Z][x]$ has degree $n$, I would like to calculate the norm of the general element $$a_0+a_1\beta+\cdots+a_{n-1}\beta^{n-1}.$$

In particular, here is my attempt when $\alpha=2^\frac{1}{3}$:

Let $K=Q[2^\frac{1}{3}]$. Using the definition of the norm, it is the determinant of the linear transformation. Consider $\alpha =a+2^{\frac{1}{3}}b+2^{\frac{2}{3}}c$ acting by multiplication on the element $d+2^{\frac{1}{3}}e+2^{\frac{2}{3}}f$. Since $$\left(a+2^{\frac{1}{3}}b+2^{\frac{2}{3}}c\right)\left(d+2^{\frac{1}{3}}e+2^{\frac{2}{3}}f\right)=ad+2bf+2ce+2^{\frac{1}{3}}\left(ae+bd+2cf\right)+2^{\frac{2}{3}}\left(af+dc+be\right) $$ in the basis $[1,2^{\frac{1}{3}},2^{\frac{2}{3}}$ we may view multiplication by $\alpha$ as a linear transform $$\alpha\left[\begin{array}{c} d\\ e\\ f \end{array}\right]=\left[\begin{array}{c} ad+2bf+2ce\\ ae+bd+2cf\\ af+dc+be \end{array}\right].$$ Using the above, we see that $$\alpha=\left[\begin{array}{ccc} a & 2c & 2b\\ b & a & 2c\\ c & b & a \end{array}\right] $$ in this basis. Taking the determinant we find $$\det \left[\begin{array}{ccc} a & 2c & 2b\\ b & a & 2c\\ c & b & a \end{array}\right] =a\left(a^{2}-2bc\right)-2c\left(ba-2c^{2}\right)+2b(b^{2}-ac) $$ $$=a^{3}+2b^{3}+4c^{3}-6abc. $$
This means we have shown that $N_K(\alpha)=a^{3}+2b^{3}+4c^{3}-6abc$ for $\alpha=a+2^{\frac{1}{3}}b+2^{\frac{2}{3}}c$


(1) Was the above calculation correct? Can we conclude that the norm of a general element in that space is $a^{3}+2b^{3}+4c^{3}-6abc$?

(2) Is there a better way to do this computation? What about if the extension is Galois?

share|cite|improve this question
Just some minor suggestions: The $1/3$ exponents are quite hard to read, I thought they were $1/s.$ Perhaps just use $1/3$ instead of using \frac{} ? Or \sqrt[3]{2} ? Also, in the first line of the post, should that [Z][x] be $\mathbb{Z}[x]$? The last line before the grey area, I think it should be $\beta$ and not $\alpha$ there. And the first line of the grey area I think the Q should be $\mathbb{Q}.$ – Ragib Zaman Jul 2 '12 at 15:01
up vote 3 down vote accepted

1) Yes, the calculation was correct. A decent way to check you haven't made any arithmetic errors is to try some small integers for $a,b,c,d,e,f$ and check the norm is multiplicative.

2) This is probably the best way to do the computation. If we have a Galois extension, then the norm of an element is the product of all of its Galois conjugates. There are two ways I can think of that we can use this fact:

  • Produce the elements of $G(K/\mathbb{Q}).$ Sometimes one has to do this anyway, so in those cases that could be a short cut.
  • Assume for now your general element has the relevant coefficient non-zero so that its degree is the degree of the extension. Then since the list of distinct Galois conjugates being $\alpha_1, \alpha_2, \cdots \alpha_n$ implies the minimal polynomial is $m(x)=(x-\alpha_1)(x-\alpha_2)\cdots(x-\alpha_n),$ we can read the norm of $\alpha$ off the constant term of the minimal polynomial. Then the norm for lower degree elements follows by a limit argument.
share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.