Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $R$ be the ring of germs of continuous functions $\mathbb R \rightarrow \mathbb R$. It is clear that this is a local ring with maximal ideal $\mathcal m$ consisting of those germs $f$ with $f(0)=0$.

What is not clear to me is why $(\mathcal m)^2 =\mathcal m$ should hold. Perhaps someone can give me a small hint how to show this.

share|cite|improve this question
@MattN. : I think $(m)^2 = \{\sum f_i g_i | f_i, g_i \in m\}$. – Joel Cohen Jul 2 '12 at 7:52
@JoelCohen Yes. Right. – Rudy the Reindeer Jul 2 '12 at 7:59
This provides a counterexample for Nakayama's Lemma (without f.g. assumption). – Martin Brandenburg Jul 2 '12 at 8:26
This was my motivation to consider this non-noetherian ring. – Cyril Jul 2 '12 at 12:46
up vote 7 down vote accepted

For $f\in \mathfrak m$ we have $f=\sqrt [3]f\cdot (\sqrt [3]f)^2$ and $\sqrt [3]f, (\sqrt [3]f)^2\in \mathfrak m$, so that indeed $\mathfrak m\subset \mathfrak m^2$.
The other inclusion is trivial and we have proved that $$\mathfrak m^2 = \mathfrak m $$ Edit: warning !
The analogue of the above result is false if one replaces the ring of germs of continuous functions by the ring of germs $\mathcal C_0^k\; (1\leq k\leq \infty)$ of $k$ times continuously differentiable functions at the origin of $\mathbb R$.
Indeed if $f\in \mathfrak m^2$, we can write $f=\sum g_kh_k\; (g_k, h_k\in \mathfrak m)$ and differentiating yields $f'(0)=\sum g_k'(0)h_k(0)+\sum g_k'(0)h_k(0)=0$, so that elements $f\in \mathfrak m^2$ satisfy $f'(0)=0$ .
In particular $x\notin \mathfrak m^2$, although $x\in \mathfrak m$.
Hence $$\mathfrak m^2 \subsetneq \mathfrak m$$

share|cite|improve this answer

The inclusion $(m)^2 \subset m$ is obvious. To prove the other inclusion, take $f \in m$. We wish to prove that $f \in (m)^2$. Define $f_+(x) = \max(f(x),0)$ and $f_-(x) = \min(f(x),0)$. Note that we have $f_+, f_- \in m$, $f_+ \ge 0$, $f_- \le 0$ and

$$f = f_+ + f_-$$ Now define $g = \sqrt{f_+}$ and $h = \sqrt{-f_-}$. We also have $h,g \in m$, and

$$f = g^2 - h^2 \in (m)^2$$

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.