Tell me more ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Consider the equation $$|2^x-3^y|=1$$ in the unknowns $x \in \mathbb{N}$ and $y \in \mathbb{N}$. Is it possible to prove that the only solutions are $(1,1)$, $(2,1)$ and $(3,2)$?

share|improve this question
What kind of numbers are $x$ and $y$? – Siminore Jun 30 '12 at 10:43
@Siminore, the title asks for "natural pairs" so presumably what's wanted is natural numbers. – Gerry Myerson Jun 30 '12 at 10:47
Ok, I'll edit the question to make it more explicit. – Siminore Jun 30 '12 at 10:50
Thanks for the edit, Siminore :) – Andrius Naruševičius Jun 30 '12 at 11:00

3 Answers

up vote 7 down vote accepted

Yes. Levi ben Gerson (1288-1344), also known as Gersonides, proved this. The Gersonides proof can be found here.

share|improve this answer
1  
Ah, number theory is always amazing! – Siminore Jun 30 '12 at 10:52

This is an easy consequence of Catalan's conjecture, which was famously proved by Preda Mihăilescu in 2002 (so now it's also called Mihăilescu's theorem):

$3^2-2^3=1$ is the only solution to $x^a - y^b = 1$ for integers $a, b, x, y \ge 2$.

share|improve this answer
1  
True, but that is killing a fly with an atom bomb. – Gerry Myerson Jun 30 '12 at 11:01
2  
That's going too far, Gerry! I'm using a sledgehammer to crack a nut, is all. – TonyK Jun 30 '12 at 11:02

Assume that $x>3$ and $y>2$.

$3^2=1\pmod{8}$. Since $3\not=-1\pmod{8}$ we know that $3^y\not=-1\pmod{8}$. Thus, if $|2^x-3^y|=1$, we must have $2^x-3^y=-1$ and $y$ must be even. Thus, we get that $$ 2^x=(3^{y/2}-1)(3^{y/2}+1)\tag{1} $$ The only factors of a power of $2$ are other powers of $2$, and the only powers of two that differ by $2$ are $2$ and $4$, but since $y>2$, we have $3^{y/2}-1>2$ and $3^{y/2}+1>4$.

Therefore, there are no $x>3$ and $y>2$ so that $|2^x-3^y|=1$.

share|improve this answer
Wow this proof looks even better than the Levi's one :O – Andrius Naruševičius Jun 30 '12 at 20:03
@AndriusNaruševičius: I just saw the link in Gerry's answer (since you mentioned it). It seems to be the same idea, just reorganized a bit. I did what I thought was the hard case, because the other cases seem almost trivial. – robjohn Jun 30 '12 at 20:42
Still looks more understandable to an average person :) – Andrius Naruševičius Jul 1 '12 at 6:50

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.