Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $X$ be a normed space and $(x_n)$ is a Cauchy sequence in the norm sense. Also assume the $x_n \rightarrow x_0 $ weakly. Then $x_n \rightarrow x_0 $ in norm.

What I did:Take $ \varepsilon >0 $ since $x_n$ is cauchy there a $n_0$ such that $ |\!| x_n-x_m |\!|< \epsilon$ $\forall n,m \geq n_0$ From Hahn Banach there are $x^{*} _n\, \in X^{*}$ such that $|\!| x_n-x_0 |\!| = | x^{*}_n (x_n-x_0)|$ and $|\!| x^{*}_n |\!|=1$. Hence \begin{align} |\!| x_n-x_0 |\!| &= | x^{*}_n (x_n-x_0)|\\ &=| x^{*}_n (x_n-x_m+x_m-x_0)| \\ &\leq | x^{*}_n (x_n-x_m)|+| x^{*}_n (x_m-x_0)|\\ &\leq \varepsilon+| x^{*}_n (x_m-x_0)|. \end{align} Since the last inequality hold $\forall m \geq n_0$ we can take the limit in respect of $m$ and then we get $|\!| x_n-x_0 |\!| \leq \epsilon $ (Since $x_n \rightarrow x_0 $ weakly). And then by definition we are done. Where I saw this exercise there was a hint.

Hint Observe that $x_n \in x_m +\varepsilon B_X$ and $x_m+\varepsilon B_X$ is weakly closed. How do we proceed from there?

share|cite|improve this question
Your solution looks good, but let me make sure I understand: Your actual question is how to use the hint? – Jonas Meyer Jun 27 '12 at 19:43
Yes, yes exactly – clark Jun 27 '12 at 19:44
Here's another way to think of it that probably doesn't answer your question: Let $Y\supseteq X$ be the (Banach space) completion of $X$, and let $y\in Y$ be the norm limit of $(x_n)$. Then $(x_n)\to y$ weakly in $Y$. Since $X$ is dense in $Y$, $(x_n)\to x_0$ weakly in $Y$. Since the weak topology is Hausdorff, $y=x_0$, so $(x_n)\to x_0$ in norm. – Jonas Meyer Jun 27 '12 at 19:47
up vote 2 down vote accepted

Fix $\varepsilon>0$. Since $\{x_n:n\in\mathbb{N}\}$ is a Cauchy sequence we can find $N\in\mathbb{N}$ such that $n\geq m\geq N$ implies $x_n \in x_m+\varepsilon B_X$

Since $\{x_n:n\geq N\}\subset x_m+\varepsilon B_X$ and $x_m+\varepsilon B_X$ is weakly closed, then $$ x_0=w\lim\limits_{n\to\infty} x_n\in x_m+\varepsilon B_X. $$ Thus $x_0\in x_m+\varepsilon B_X$, which can be reformulated as $\Vert x_m-x_0\Vert\leq \varepsilon$.

Finally for all $\varepsilon>0$ there exist $N\in\mathbb{N}$ such that $m\geq N$ implies $\Vert x_m-x_0\Vert\leq \varepsilon$, hence $$x_0=\lim\limits_{m\to\infty} x_m$$

share|cite|improve this answer

For a fixed $\epsilon>0$, there is an $m$ so that for all $n\ge m$ we have $x_n\in x_m+\epsilon B_X$. Then we have $(x_j)_{j\ge m}\subset x_m+\epsilon B_X$; from this and the fact that $x_m+\epsilon B_X$ is weakly closed, we must have $x_0\in x_m+\epsilon B_X$. But then it follows that $\Vert x_n-x_0\Vert<\epsilon$ for all $n\ge m$.

share|cite|improve this answer

We have that $x_0\in x_m+\varepsilon B_X$. Indeed, if it's not the case, $x_0$ is in a weakly open set, and we can find a neighborhood $V$ of $x_0$ for the weak topology such that $x_0\in V\subset \complement (x_m+\varepsilon B_x)$. But $x_n$ should be in this neighborhood for $n$ large enough.

But in fact, both approach use Hahn-Banach (in the second it's used for the weak-closeness of the closed unit ball).

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.