Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I know the meaning of tensor, but I forgot the meaning of "$(n,m)$-tensor". What do $n$ and $m$ refer to?

Thanks.

share|improve this question
6  
1  
What do you mean by tensor: an element of a tensor product of vector spaces (if not modules) or a field of tensors on a manifold? Assuming your meaning of tensor is the first one, an $(n,m)$ tensor means an element of $(V^{\otimes n}) \otimes (V^*)^{\otimes m}$ for some vector space $V$. –  KCd Jun 27 '12 at 11:39
add comment

1 Answer 1

up vote 3 down vote accepted

An $(n,m)$-tensor on a finite-dimensional real vector space $V$ is (usually) defined to be a multilinear map $\Phi:\underbrace{V^{\ast}\times\cdots \times V^{\ast}}_{n\text{ times}}\times \underbrace{V\times\cdots \times V}_{m\text{ times}}\to \mathbb{R}$; $V^{*}$ denotes the dual space of $V$, i.e., the real vector space of all linear functionals $V\to\mathbb{R}$. The nonnegative integers $n$ and $m$ are referred to as the covariant and contravariant orders of the type $(n,m)$-tensor $\Phi$ on $V$, respectively.

share|improve this answer
1  
You have the $V$ and $V^*$ backwards. For example, a tensor of type $(n,0)$ is supposed to be an element of $V^{\otimes n}$, but by your description it is a multilinear map $V \times \cdots \times V \rightarrow {\mathbf R}$, which in terms of tensor products is an element of $(V^{\otimes n})^* \cong (V^*)^{\otimes n}$. –  KCd Jun 27 '12 at 11:36
1  
You need $V$ to be finite-dimensional here. A tensor of type $(n, m)$ is supposed to be an element of $V^{\otimes n} \otimes (V^*)^{\otimes m}$. –  Zhen Lin Jun 27 '12 at 13:06
1  
You say this was fixed, but I do not see a fix having been made. A (1,0) tensor is just an element of $V$, but by the way the answer is currently written (which may change after I post this) a (1,0) tensor is a linear map from $V$ to ${\mathbf R}$, which is an element of $V^*$. –  KCd Jun 27 '12 at 15:29
1  
@KCd How about now? The reason I said it was fixed earlier was because I thought you were saying that my definition of $n$ and $m$ as the covariant and contravariant orders of the tensor $\Phi$ on $V$ was incorrect; rather $n$ and $m$ are the contravariant and covariant orders of $\Phi$ on $V$ (and I agree with that). I assumed that otherwise the notation "$(n,m)$" for a type $(n,m)$-tensor $\Phi$ on $V$ was a matter of convention and different people used different conventions to denote the same object. However, perhaps I was incorrect; in any case, I have changed my answer. –  Amitesh Datta Jun 28 '12 at 3:01
1  
@ZhenLin: Dear Zhen, You are right, but Amitesh's answer has the benefit that it doesn't require the concept of tensor product! Cheers, –  Matt E Jun 28 '12 at 3:48
show 2 more comments

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.