Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Recently I thought about concepts for calculating with sets instead of numbers. There you might have axioms like:

  1. For every $a\in\mathbb{R}$ (or $a\in\mathbb{C}$) we identify the term $a$ with $\{a\}$.

  2. For any operator $\circ$ we define $A\circ B := \{a\circ b : a\in A\land b\in B\}$.

  3. For any function $f$ we define $f(A) := \{ f(a) : a\in A \}$. (More general: For a function $f(x_1,\ldots, x_n)$ we define $f(A_1,\ldots, A_n):= \{f(a_1,\ldots, a_n): a_1\in A_1 \land \dots \land a_n\in A_n \}$).

  4. One has to find a good definition for $f^{-1}(A)$ which might be the inverse image of $A$.

((3.) is just the normal definition of the image and (2.) is a special case of (3.))

Now I am interested to learn about theories and concepts where one actually calculates with sets (similar to the above axioms).

After a while I found interval arithmetic. What theories or approaches do you know?

Because there will not be just one answer to my question, I will accept the answer with the most upvotes.

Update: The theories do not have to follow the above axioms. It's okay when they make there own definitions how a function shall act on sets. It is just important that you calculate with sets in the theory, concept or approach.

share|cite|improve this question
Are you sure that $x^2 = 4 \Rightarrow x = \{ 2, -2 \}$? Looks like $x$ could be $\{2\}$ or $\{-2\}$, according to your item 3. – user31373 Jun 24 '12 at 18:55
You are right. I will delete my examples because they might be confusing... – tampis Jun 24 '12 at 18:59
You could simply write $x\in \{2,-2\}$ instead of $x=\{2,-2\}$. This holds without changing any axioms or creating any new ones. For the second example $x\in [-1,1]$ will suffice. – Andrew Salmon Jun 24 '12 at 19:01
Monoid of subsets of a group have been mentioned at MSE a few times, e.g. here. Proofwiki mentions some basic properties. – Martin Sleziak Jun 27 '12 at 7:10
@MartinSleziak thx for the links ;-) – tampis Jun 27 '12 at 7:12
up vote 3 down vote accepted

I like Minkowski addition, aka vector addition. It is a basic operation in the geometry of convex sets. See: zonotopes & zonoids, Brunn-Minkowski inequality, polar sets... and here's a neat inequality for an arbitrary convex set $A\subset\mathbb R^n$: $$ \mathrm{volume}\,(A-A)\le \binom{2n}{n}\mathrm{volume}\,(A) $$ with equality when $A$ is a simplex. (Due to Rogers and Shepard, see here)

The case $n=1$ isn't nearly as exciting.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.