Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

When trying to prove that a particular root (say $\sqrt{2}$ or $\sqrt{10}$) cannot be rational, I always see a particular indirect proof that goes something like this:

Suppose $\sqrt{x}$ were rational; then, there would be two integers $a$ and $b$ such that $a/b$ was $\sqrt{x}$. We can also assume that $a$ and $b$ have no common factors, because we can simplify $a/b$ as much as we want before we begin.

Then, $(a/b)^2 = x$, or $a^2/b^2=x$, or $a^2 = x * b^2$. But, if $a * a$ is a multiple of $x$ then $a$ must also be a multiple of $x$, so we can rewrite $a$ as $a = cx$ and substitute:

$(c * x)^2 = x * b^2$, or $x^2 * c^2 = x * b^2$. Divide by $x$ and we get that $b^2 = x * c^2$.

But we've now shown that both $a$ and $b$ have a factor of x, contradicting our original assumption; this means that $\sqrt{x}$ cannot be rational.

I see why this proof works, what I don't see is why you can't plug in a number with an actual rational root, like 16, and not form the same proof that $\sqrt{16}$ cannot be rational.

share|improve this question
3  
The crucial step, which fails for x=16, is when one asserts that if a^2 is a multiple of x then a is a multiple of x. –  Did Jun 23 '12 at 19:32
    
See also this very closely related question. –  Bill Dubuque Jun 23 '12 at 20:39

4 Answers 4

up vote 4 down vote accepted

The proof will work for any integer (or rational) that is not a perfect square, since it will have a prime factor occurring to an odd power, which is precisely what's needed for the proof to succeed. Namely from $\rm\:a^2 = x b^2\:$ we deduce, by unique factorization, that the power of every prime $\rm\:p\:$ dividing $\rm\:x\:$ must be even, being the difference of two even integers (the power of $\rm\:p\:$ in $\rm\:a^2\:$ minus the power in $\rm\:b^2$).

Generally it is not true that $\rm\:x\:|\:a^2\:\Rightarrow\:x\:|\:a\ $ (e.g. let $\rm\:x = a^2 > 1)$. In fact this property is true iff $\rm\:x\:$ is squarefree, which is why the proof works for $\rm\:x\:$ prime (or a product of distinct primes) which, having at least one prime to the power one, certainly does have a prime occurring to an odd power. The general case reduces to this case by pulling the square part of $\rm\:x\:$ out of $\rm\:\sqrt{x},\:$ i.e. if $\rm\:x = n^2 y,\:$ with $\rm\:y\:$ squarefree then we have $\rm\:\sqrt{x} = \sqrt{n^2 y} = n\sqrt{y}\in \mathbb Q\iff\sqrt{y}\in\mathbb Q.$ Therefore your method of proof will work if you first reduce this way to the case where $\rm\:x\:$ is squarefree.

share|improve this answer
    
hm. so that part of the proof is true iff x is not a perfect square; isn't that just begging the question then? Aren't we trying to prove that x is not a perfect square? –  Michael Edenfield Jun 23 '12 at 22:38
    
@Michael The proof works if $\rm\:x\:$ has nontrivial squarefree part $\rm\,(y\ne 1),\,$ i.e. if $\rm\:x\:$ is not the square of an integer. It proves, further, $\rm\:x\:$ is not the square of a rational, i.e. $\rm\, \sqrt{x}\not\in\mathbb Z\:\Rightarrow\:\sqrt{x}\not\in \mathbb Q,\:$ i.e. $\rm\:\sqrt{x}\:$ is irrational. –  Bill Dubuque Jun 23 '12 at 23:35
1  
@Michael This is a special case of the Rational Root Test, which implies that if $\rm\:x^2-n\:$ has rational root $\rm\:x=a/b\:$ in lowest terms then $\rm\:b\:$ divides the leading coef $= 1$, therefore $\rm\:a/b\in\mathbb Z,\:$ i.e. $\rm\:x = \sqrt{n}\in \mathbb Q\:\Rightarrow\:\sqrt{n}\in\mathbb Z.$ $\ \ $ –  Bill Dubuque Jun 23 '12 at 23:48
    
Ah. So for example, we know that $\sqrt{2}$ is not an integer because it must be 1 < x < 2, so we can use this proof to further prove that it cannot be rational either. –  Michael Edenfield Jun 24 '12 at 14:02

The statement $x|a^2\Rightarrow x|a$ is not generally true (Counter-example : $8|4^2$ but we have not $8|4$).

The proof works for $x$ prime, because, then, this statement is true by Euclid's lemma.

share|improve this answer

Another way to think about this is to reformulate your proof to go through the following statement:

If $\gcd(a,b)=1$, then $\gcd(a^2, b^2)=1$.

This follows immediately from unique factorization (or with a little more work from Euclidean-algorithm-type arguments). It also directly implies that any rational square root of an integer is itself an integer. Say $(a/b)^2=n$ with $a/b$ in lowest terms, then $\gcd(a,b)=1$. Thus $\gcd(a^2,b^2)=1$, so $a^2/b^2$ is a fraction in lowest terms which is also equal to an integer, and hence $b= \pm 1$.

I like this way of thinking about it because it does apply to rational roots of integers; it just gives a different conclusion (that they're integers, rather than that they're irrational).

share|improve this answer
    
+1 because that was actually another question I had -- is it true that all rational squares of integers are themselves integers. –  Michael Edenfield Jun 23 '12 at 22:40
    
(of course I meant "rational roots") –  Michael Edenfield Jun 24 '12 at 14:03

Take your example for $\sqrt{16}$ and note that $a=4$ then $a^2 = 16$ does not imply $a$ is a multiple of 16.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.