Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I'm reading R.E. Gompf and A.I. Stipsicz, 4-Manifolds and Kirby Calculus. There is something I don't understand on page 116 (Google Books link to page 116; alternatively, here are images of page 115 and page 116)

Now, we consider compact 4-manifolds, and they have handle decomposition. 0-handle and $m$ 1-handles form $X_{1}$, which is diffeomorphic to $\natural m S^1 \times D^3$. Let $X_{2}$ be $X_{1}\cup $ 2-handles. I understand those facts, but I can't understand $$\partial X_{2}=\partial(\natural m S^1 \times D^3).$$ If you can help me, then please teach me the reason for this.

share|cite|improve this question
Sorry, I edited the naturals to sharps, but then I realized Gompf and Stipsicz used naturals! So I reverted to Zev Chonoles's edit. – Grumpy Parsnip Jun 23 '12 at 18:34
Apparently I earned the "cleanup" badge for cleaning up my own mistake. :) – Grumpy Parsnip Jun 23 '12 at 19:38
up vote 2 down vote accepted

The idea is to use duality to notice that the union of $3$ and $4$ handles must be isomorphic to some handlebody $\natural nS^1\times D^3$. (Here $m$ doesn't have to equal $n$. If you look at the book carefully, it uses both $n$ and $m$.) Recall that a $k$-handle can be thought of as an $(n-k)$-handle if you read the decomposition backward. (This is the dual decomposition.) Thus the $3$ and $4$ handles represent $0$ and $1$-handles in the dual decomposition. The union of the rest of the handles must attach to the boundary of this, so their boundary must equal $\partial(\natural nS^1\times D^3)$.

share|cite|improve this answer
Okay,I see that,but I can't understand that 3-,4-handles and 0-,1-,2-handles must have the same boundary.Why? – Takahiro Oba Jun 24 '12 at 1:12
Because you are gluing them together to get a closed manifold. – Grumpy Parsnip Jun 24 '12 at 3:27
Oh,I see.Thanks:-) – Takahiro Oba Jun 24 '12 at 11:11

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.