Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $$ x_{n+1} = \left\{ \begin{array}{c} x_{n}^2 & \mbox{if $b_{n+1}=1$} \\ \alpha x_n & \mbox{if $b_{n+1}=0$}\end{array} \right. , $$ for $n\ge 0$ and $\alpha > 1$. Can we write $x_k$ in terms of $x_0$ and $P$ where $$ P = \sum_{i=1}^{k} b_i. $$ For $\alpha=1$, $$ x_k = x_0^{\left( 2^P \right)}. $$ I am unable to figure out the expression for any $\alpha>1$.

share|cite|improve this question
    
I'm sure $x_k$ depends on the order of the $b_i$s if $\alpha^2 \ne 1$ – Cocopuffs Jun 23 '12 at 17:26
    
exactly! and that's why I thought that $P$ alone may not be sufficient to describe it. – ubaabd Jun 23 '12 at 17:28
    
What's the connection between $x_n$ and $b_n$? – Mercy King Jun 23 '12 at 17:42
    
they are independent – ubaabd Jun 23 '12 at 17:46
    
what is $b_n$ then? – Mercy King Jun 23 '12 at 18:10
up vote 1 down vote accepted

No. Let $\alpha > 1$ and $x_0 \ne 0$. For $b_1 = 0, b_2 = 1$ you have $x_2 = \alpha^2 x_0^2$ and for $b_1 = 1, b_2 = 0$ you have $x_2 = \alpha x_0^2$. These aren't equal, so $x_2$ doesn't depend on $x_0$ and $P = b_1 + b_2$ alone.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.