Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I hope to prove this, $$ | \Delta f | \leqslant n | \nabla^2 f| $$ where $f : \mathbb R^n \to \mathbb R $.

share|cite|improve this question
-1 for unexplained notation in the question. – user31373 Jun 23 '12 at 16:52
up vote 2 down vote accepted

Use Cauchy-Schwarz inequality $$ |\Delta f|=\left|\sum\limits_{i=1}^n \partial_i^2 f\right|= \left|\sum\limits_{i=1}^n 1\cdot\partial_i^2 f\right|\leq \left(\sum\limits_{i=1}^n 1^2\right)^{1/2}\left(\sum\limits_{i=1}^n (\partial_i^2 f)^2\right)^{1/2}= \sqrt{n}|\nabla^2 f|\leq n|\nabla^2 f| $$

share|cite|improve this answer

I don't understand. Isn't $\Delta f=\nabla^2f$? This is assuming that the first $\nabla$ means divergence, the second gradient.

share|cite|improve this answer
oh sorry, $\Delta$ means laplacian. – Miau Jun 23 '12 at 10:11
@Miau The laplacian is defined as $\nabla^{2}$ – Shaktal Jun 23 '12 at 10:12
Even if you define the Laplacian directly as the sum of the second partial derivatives, it is a very easy computation to show that $\Delta=\nabla^2$. – Stefan Geschke Jun 23 '12 at 10:13
sorry, I wrote that $ \nabla^2 f = ( \partial_1^2 f , \cdots , \partial_n^2 f) $. – Miau Jun 23 '12 at 10:14
This is your definition of $\nabla^2$ now? This is certainly not the usual definition. – Stefan Geschke Jun 23 '12 at 10:21

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.