Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I have the following problem:

Let X be a Noetherian Scheme and suppose that $X_{red}$ is affine. Show that this implies that X is affine.

OK, so I know the "classical" proof of this using Serre's criterion for affineness and with cohomology. However, I encountered this in an early chapter of Görtz-Wedhorn's book where none of these concepts have thus far been defined. I have been trying to come up with an elementary proof but without much success. Clearly, we can assume that the ideal sheaf $\mathcal{N}$ satisfies $\mathcal{N}^2 = 0$.

I would be very grateful for help with this problem of any sort, ranging from hints to solutions.

share|cite|improve this question
The tricky part is to prove that $\Gamma(X,O_X) \to \Gamma(X_{red},O_{X_{red}})$ is surjective i.e. $H^1(X,\mathcal{N}) = 0$ which I think can be done by hand. Once you have that you can deduce that $X \to Spec(\Gamma(X,O_X))$ is an homeomorphism (because it is so for $X_{red}$). Then check that $\Gamma(X,O_X)_{\mathfrak{p}} \to O_{X,\mathfrak{p}}$ is an isomorphism for each $\mathfrak{p}$. – AFK Jun 23 '12 at 21:07
I posted a similar question in MathOverflow. – Makoto Kato Apr 2 '14 at 0:16
@YBL Dear YBL, I wonder how you prove that the last homomorphism of local rings is an isomorphism. Regards, – Makoto Kato Apr 5 '14 at 20:41

It suffices to prove the following proposition without using cohomology.

Proposition Let $X$ be a scheme. Suppose there exists a quasi coherent $\mathcal O_X$-ideal $\mathcal I$ such that $\mathcal I^2 = 0$ and $(X, \mathcal O_X/\mathcal I)$ is affine. Let $\mathcal F$ be a quasi-coherent $\mathcal O_X$-module. Then $\mathcal F$ is quasi-flasque.

Proof(without using cohomology): Consider the following exact sequence. $0 \rightarrow \mathcal I \mathcal F \rightarrow \mathcal F \rightarrow \mathcal F/\mathcal I\mathcal F \rightarrow 0$. Since $\mathcal I \mathcal F$ and $\mathcal F/\mathcal I\mathcal F$ are both quasi-coherent $\mathcal O_X/\mathcal I$-modules, they are quasi-flasque by my answer to this question. Hence $\mathcal F$ is quasi-flasque by jdc's answer to this question.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.