Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Can someone give me, with proof, an example of a Noetherian ring which has Krull dimension one but is not a Dedekind domain?

I think it would also be instructive to see other "near misses."

share|cite|improve this question
A domain is Dedekind if and only if it is integrally closed, Noetherian, and has Krull dimension $1$. So if you want to stick to domains, just take one which is not integrally closed but is all the rest. Wouldn't $\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-3}]$ work, or more generally, $\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{d}]$ with $d\neq 1$, squarefree, and $d\equiv 1 \pmod{4}$? – Arturo Magidin Jan 3 '11 at 1:35
Must, not, make, movie, reference. – uncle brad Jan 3 '11 at 3:05
The affine ring of an irreducible singular affine curve is such an example. – Makoto Kato Jun 5 '12 at 2:43
@vadim123 Only 15 topics tagged as Krull-dimension? I bet you can find more! – user26857 Jun 21 '13 at 7:05
up vote 7 down vote accepted

The ring $\mathbb{Z}[2i]$ is an example. It satisfies all the properties of a Dedekind domain except that it is not integrally closed. (To see that it satisfies these properties, note that it is integral over $\mathbb{Z}$, so the Krull dimension is one, as integral extensions preserve dimension. It is also clearly noetherian.)

share|cite|improve this answer
As for the proof that integral extensions preserve dimension, the following is my proof. Is there an easier way to see it? Let's suppose that B is integral over A. By Lying-Over, dim B \geq dim A. Conversely, it is a standard argument that if p \subset q is a strict containment in B, then the containment is still strict after intersecting. – Tony Jan 4 '11 at 14:46
@Tony: That's the standard argument, I believe; I'm afraid I know of no others. – Akhil Mathew Jan 4 '11 at 16:22

The ring $R_1 = \mathbb{Z} \times \mathbb{Z}$ gives a counterexample to your claim (it is not a domain). However $\operatorname{Spec}(R_1)$ is a Dedekind scheme, so this is a somewhat cheap counterexample. The counterexample $R_2 = \mathbb{Z}[t]/(t^2)$ is more serious.

share|cite|improve this answer

If by "other near misses" you mean other rings that satisfy two of the three conditions for being a Dedekind domain, another such ring is k[x, y], which is Noetherian (by the Hilbert basis theorem), integrally closed (it is a UFD, and UFDs are integrally closed) but not every prime ideal is maximal (for example (x)).

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.