Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Possible Duplicate:
$\arcsin$ written as $\sin^{-1}(x)$

When I learnt the trig identity $\sin^2\theta + \cos^2\theta \equiv 1$, I learnt that $\sin^2\theta = (\sin\theta)^2$.

So why isn't $\sin^{-1}\theta = (\sin\theta)^{-1} = \dfrac{1}{\sin\theta}$?

Because $\csc\theta = \dfrac{1}{\sin\theta} $, but $\csc\theta \ne \sin^{-1}\theta$

How can these two same notations, just with different numbers, mean different things?

share|cite|improve this question

marked as duplicate by J. M., Blue, Henning Makholm, Ross Millikan, Zev Chonoles Jun 23 '12 at 2:41

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

In the good old days, the notation $\arcsin x$ was the common one. The greater current popularity of $\sin^{-1} x$ is probably due to calculators: $\arcsin$ does no fit nicely into the cramped space above the $\sin$ buton. – André Nicolas Jun 22 '12 at 23:00

It is a notational thing, there is nothing mathematically wrong here.

We denote the inverse of a function $f$ by $f^{-1}$. So when you see sin$^{-1}(x)$, this means "the inverse sin function", not the reciprocal.

But also sin$^2 (x)$ is just notation for $(\text{sin}(x))^2$, there is no mathematical reason why they are equal, it is by definition.

I know it is slightly confusing but it is notation that has stuck through time...

share|cite|improve this answer

It's only a matter of convention. $f^{-1}$ is used to mean the inverse function of $f$, pretty much always. Only with $\cos$, $\sin$ and other trigonometric functions we usually multiply those together, or square or cube them. That's why it becomes useful to write $\cos^2 x$ as a shortcut for $(\cos x)^2$, for example. But it's just notation (that can be confusing at times).

share|cite|improve this answer
why can't $cos^2X$ be written as $cos(X)^2$ (which is different to $cosX^2 == cos(X^2)$)? – Jonathan. Jun 23 '12 at 11:47
@Jonathan. Sure it can, but $\cos^2 x$ is shorter, and maybe $\cos (x)^2$ can be easily mixed up with $\cos (x^2)$. – talmid Jun 23 '12 at 16:05
+1 for "it's just a convention". You can use whatever notation you care to use for whatever you care to use it for - you'll only have problems if you try to communicate with someone else. The Nobel Prize-winning physicist Richard Feynman developed his own notation for trigonometric functions because, as a self-taught mathematician, he did not initially know the standard notation. Sadly, I am not Richard Feynman, I am not a self-taught mathematicians who conjured trigonometry from thin air while in high school, and thus it's a good idea for me, at least, to use the standard notation for trig. – Bob Jarvis Sep 16 '14 at 3:14

I seem to recall reading that Gauss said that the notation $\sin^2\theta$ ought to mean $\sin(\sin(\theta))$, and similarly for other powers. That would be consistent with using $\sin^{-1}$ to mean the inverse function.

So $\sin^{-1}$ means the inverse function because $\sin^3\theta$ ought to mean $\sin\sin\sin\theta$.

share|cite|improve this answer

Because $\sin^{-1}$ is thought of more as the inverse function. So let's say $f = \sin$. Then the inverse function if $f^{-1} = \sin^{-1}$. Also, $\sin^{-1}$ can be also written as $\arcsin$.

share|cite|improve this answer

This universally observed convention is just an example of overloading of notation, where the meaning of notation depends upon context.

share|cite|improve this answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.