Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I have a presentation in which I want to point out a difference between two functions. Instead of putting the two functions on a slide and pointing to the differences, I want to do something simple.

The first function has a form of $f_1(x) = g(x)\log (h(x))$ and the second function has the form $f_2(x) = g(x)\log(r(x)h(x))$.

The thing is that saying something along the lines "$f_2(x) - f_1(x)$ have the form of $g(x)\log r(x)$ keeps the $g(x)$ (which is rather complicated) and saying something like $f_2(x)/f_1(x)$ has the form $\log h(x) / \log (r(x)h(x))$ is also cumbersome.

Does anyone see a clear way to point out the difference between these two functions by only making explicit the additional $r(x)$?

I would really like to make it simple, ideas are welcome.

share|cite|improve this question
How about $f_1/g - f_2/g$? – Aryabhata Jan 2 '11 at 3:39
How about $\frac{f_2}{f_1}=1+ \log _{r(x)} h(x) $? – Arjang Jan 2 '11 at 5:03

The short answer to your question is no.

To see this, define $a(x) = g(x) \log(h(x))$.

So we have $a(x) = f_1(x)$ and $a(x) + \log(r(x)) g(x) = f_2(x)$.

So here we have two linearly independent equations in $a(x)$ and $g(x)$.

Hence at best we can solve for $a(x)$ and $g(x)$ (i.e. we can solve for $h(x)$ and $g(x)$) in terms of $f_1(x)$ and $f_2(x)$.

So, either we need another equation, so that we can plug in what we obtain to get rid of $g(x)$ and $h(x)$ or We need $g(x)$ or $h(x)$ to be some contant so that the dependence of a relation between $f_1(x),f_2(x)$ and $r(x)$ on $g(x)$ or $h(x)$ is hidden.

You could however define new functions $\tilde{f_1}$ and $\tilde{f_2}$ depending on $f_1(x)$,$f_2(x)$,$g(x)$ and $h(x)$ and massage to get a relation between $\tilde{f_1}$ and $\tilde{f_2}$.

share|cite|improve this answer

instead of $f_1,f_2$ would you rather consider $e^{f_2-f_1}={r(x)^{g(x)}}$?

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.