Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

$\varphi\colon M\to N$ continuous surjective and closed. Then $f\colon N\to P$ continuous iff $f\circ\varphi\colon M\to P$ is continuous. (Topological spaces)

I think that this proposition is true like I noted in $\varphi\colon M\to N$ continuous and open. Then $f$ continuous iff $f\circ\varphi$ continuous. (My commentary in Added (2)) which is true if we put $\varphi$ open instead of closed (in this case the proof is straightforward).

I tried a proof to this harder fact but is so large. I was put this as an possible answer to this question.

share|improve this question
add comment

2 Answers 2

up vote 2 down vote accepted

Here's a way of doing it:

Now, let $f\colon N\to P$, $\varphi\colon M\to N$ and assume that $\varphi$ is both continuous, onto, and closed. We assume that $f\circ\varphi$ is continuous, and we want to show that $f$ is continuous. Is suffices to show that the inverse image (under $f$) of a closed set is closed.

Let $C\subseteq P$ be closed. Since $f\circ \varphi$ is continuous, then $(f\circ\varphi)^{-1}(C)$ is closed. Therefore, $\varphi((f\circ\varphi)^{-1}(C))$ is a closed subset of $N$.

I claim that $\varphi((f\circ\varphi)^{-1}(C) = f^{-1}(C)$. Indeed, note that $(f\circ\varphi)^{-1}(C) = \varphi^{-1}(f^{-1}(C))$, and that since $\varphi$ is onto, we have $\varphi(\varphi^{-1}(B)) = B$ for all $B\subseteq N$.

Thus, $f^{-1}(C) = \varphi((f\circ\varphi)^{-1})(C))$, which is closed, so $f$ is continuous (since inverse image of closed subsets are closed). $\Box$

share|improve this answer
    
Thanks!! My proof was ridiculously long and complicated. This exercise don't looks hard and must have a simple answer. My first attempt was using closed sets and preimages but when I got $\varphi[(f\circ\varphi)^{-1}[C]]$ I didn't think that would be useful and never think that be equal to preimage by $f$ of $C$. –  Gastón Burrull Jun 20 '12 at 2:12
    
Now is better!! The equality follow easier! –  Gastón Burrull Jun 20 '12 at 2:38
add comment

I think that I have the answer as I said in my question but I'm using many facts and my proof turns so large and I think sometimes that a large proof maybe is a wrong proof but this is my attempt:

The direction $\implies$ is trivial.

For $\Longleftarrow$ we want to prove continuity of $f\colon N\to P$ in some fixed point $a\in N$. Let $V\subset P$ some open set containing $f(a)$. We want to find an open subset $W\subset N$ such that $a\in W$ and $f[W]\subset V$

We note that $\varphi^{-1}[\{a\}]$ is not empty by surjectivity of $\varphi$, if $b\in\varphi^{-1}[\{a\}]$ we have $(f\circ\varphi)(b)=f(a)$ and by continuity of $f\circ\varphi$ in $b$ there exist an open set $U_b\subset M$ such that $(f\circ\varphi)[U_b]\subset V$. Repeating the same with each $b\in\varphi^{-1}[\{a\}]$ we obtain a collection of open sets such union $A=\bigcup_{b\in\varphi^{-1}[\{a\}]} U_b$ is an open set in $M$ such that $(f\circ\varphi)[A]\subset V$ and $\varphi^{-1}[\{a\}]\subset A$. Then is time to use the following Lemma:

Lemma: $f\colon M\to N$ (topological spaces) is closed if and only if for all $y\in N$ and all open sets $V\supset f^{-1}\left(\{y\}\right)$ in $M$ there exists an open set $U$ in $N$ containing $y$ such that $V\supset f^{-1}(U)\supset f^{-1}(\left\{y\right\})$.

Proof: This Lemma was proved in $f$ closed iff $y\in N$ and open $V\supset f^{-1}\left(\{y\}\right)$ exists $U$ open such that $V\supset f^{-1}(U)\supset f^{-1}(\left\{y\right\})$ $\square$.

By lemma, since $A$ is an open set containing $\varphi^{-1}[\{a\}]$ and $\varphi$ is closed there exists an open set $a\in B\subset N$ such that $\varphi^{-1}[B]\subset A$ therefore $$(f\circ\varphi)[\varphi^{-1}[B]]\subset (f\circ \varphi)[A]\subset V,$$ but by surjectivity of $\varphi$ we have that $\varphi[\varphi^{-1}[B]]=B$ then $$f[B]\subset V.\square$$

share|improve this answer
1  
Looks right on first read, but it seems a bit too complicated; I think the expected argument is to pull back a closed subset of $P$ all the way to $M$, and then push it forward with $\varphi$ to conclude that inverse image under $f$ of closed sets is closed. –  Arturo Magidin Jun 20 '12 at 0:28
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.