Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $\mathcal{C}$ be a symmetric monoidal category generated by one element $X$ such that $End(X)=G$ where $G$ is a finite group. Is it true that, for any object $A \in \mathcal{C}$, $End(A)$ is isomorphic to a wreath product $G \wr S_n$, $n \in \mathbb{N}$ ?

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 2 down vote accepted

No. Take the category whose objects are vector spaces of dimension $2^n$ over $\mathbb{F}_2$ for $n \in \mathbb{Z}_{\ge 0}$ and whose morphisms are all isomorphisms. The object $X = \mathbb{F}_2^2$ generates this category under tensor product (I assume this is what you meant) and $\text{End}(X) \cong \text{GL}_2(\mathbb{F}_2) \cong S_3$. It should be straightforward to verify that $\text{End}(X^{\otimes n}) \cong \text{GL}_{2^n}(\mathbb{F}_2)$ has order larger than $S_3 \wr S_n$ for sufficiently large $n$.

share|cite|improve this answer
Thank you for your answer. Could you detail the last part ? I have trouble following "generated by $\mathbb{F}_2^2$"... – AlexPof Jun 19 '12 at 6:07
@Alex: I misspoke slightly. I'll edit accordingly. – Qiaochu Yuan Jun 19 '12 at 8:42
this is a really nice answer ! Is there a general way to derive $End(X)$ in a symmetric monoidal category given $G$ ? – AlexPof Jun 19 '12 at 16:14
@Alex: you mean $\text{End}(X^{\otimes n})$? All you can say in general is that it admits a morphism from $\text{End}(X) \wr S_n$ (in a precise sense; in the symmetric monoidal category freely generated by $X$ and only the morphisms $X \to X$ there should be no other endomorphisms of $X^{\otimes n}$). – Qiaochu Yuan Jun 19 '12 at 22:12
Yes, sorry, I meant $\text{End}(X^{\otimes n})$. If I understand correctly, the fact that $\text{End}(X^{\otimes n})$ in the example you gave is bigger than $\text{End}(X) \wr S_n$ comes from the fact that $X$ has more morphisms in the most general case ? The statement in my question was indeed meant in the context of a symmetric monoidal category freely generated by X with no other morphisms $X \to X$ than those of $G$... – AlexPof Jun 20 '12 at 5:50

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.