Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

$f_n(x) : [0,1] \rightarrow \bf R $, and $f_n$ is $\frac{1}{n}$-periodic, $\max f_n(x) = n$, $\min f_n(x) = -n$.

As $n$ and $v$ goes to infinity simultaneously, prove the convergence of
$$\lim_{n,v \rightarrow \infty} \int_0^1 f_n(x) e^{-i2\pi v x}\,dx $$ if $v,n$ are integers and $v/n$ is not an integer.

share|improve this question
    
Is there a particular order of the limits, or do we have to prove convergence in the two variables simultaneously? –  Ross Millikan Dec 30 '10 at 23:15
    
It is the convergence in the two variables simultaneously. –  baikal Dec 31 '10 at 0:35
    
@user5181. I added the phrase $v,n$ are integers. –  TCL Jan 1 '11 at 15:59

1 Answer 1

up vote 3 down vote accepted

I'll assume you mean to take a limit in some sense as over double sequences indexed by natural numbers $n, \nu$ such that $\frac{\nu}{n}$ is not an integer. For $f_n$ an $\frac{1}{n}$-periodic function such that $\max f_n=-\min f_n =n$, let $g_n$ be defined by $f_n(x)=ng_n(nx)$. Then $g_n$ is $1$-periodic and has max and min equal to 1 and -1. Let $r=\frac{\nu}{n}$. Then you require that $r$ is not an integer. Then writing the integral of interest in terms of $g_n$ and $r$ and $n$, you'll be very tempted to change variables and integrate from 0 to n. Do so.

Then using the periodicity of $g_n$, you'll want to break the integral into a sum of $n$ integrals. Finally, switch the order of summation and integration, be happy that you can look up or re-derive the formula for geometric sums, and be shocked (or not, but I was pleasantly surprised).

share|improve this answer
    
My feeling is, if $v/n$ is not integer, integration of the product $f_n(x)e^{-i2\pi v x}$ cannot be broken into a sum of $n$ integrals. Can you give more hints? –  baikal Dec 31 '10 at 0:51
    
An integral from t=0 to n can always be broken into a sum of n integrals. The only part you have to be careful about is the fact that $e^{-2\pi i r t}$ won't be $1$-periodic. –  AppliedSide Dec 31 '10 at 1:45
    
Yes I see your point, just mis-understood you. –  baikal Dec 31 '10 at 1:54

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.