Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I'm familiar that fields and integral domains of finite characteristic have prime characteristic. What about the case when $R$ is a simple ring, so that the only ideals are $0$ and $R$?

I've been trying to use the usual tricks of assuming the characteristic is composite, but even though $(a)=R$ for $a\neq 0$, I'm having trouble since I can't assume that $a$ is left or right invertible since $R$ is not necessarily commutative. Is it still possible to conclude that simple rings of finite characteristic have necessarily prime characteristic?

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 5 down vote accepted

Yes. The result holds.

Note that for every $n\gt 0$, the set $nR=\{na\mid a\in R\}$ is an ideal; indeed, it is a subgroup, and if $r\in R$ and $na\in nR$, then $r(na) = n(ra)\in nR$ and $(na)r = n(ar)\in nR$.

Note that $RR$ is an ideal. Therefore, since we are assuming that $R$ is simple, either $RR=R$ or $RR=0$. Let's consider the former case first (which will hold, e.g., if $R$ has a unity).

Suppose that the characteristic is $n$ and $n=pq$; if $1\lt p$, then $qR\neq \{0\}$, and so by the simplicity of $R$ it follows that $qR=R$. Therefore, $pR = p(RR) = (pR)R = (pR)(qR) \subseteq (pq)R = nR = (0)$, which shows that $pR=0$, so $n|p$, showing that $p=n$. Thus, $n$ is prime: in any factorization $n=pq$, either $p=1$ or $p=n$.

If $R^2\neq R$, then by simplicity of $R$ we must have $R^2=0$. In particular, $ab=0$ for all $a,b\in R$, so $R$ is a ring with zero multiplication. Therefore, every subgroup of $R$ is an ideal, and so the underlying additive group of $R$ must be simple. Since the only simple abelian groups have prime order, it follows that the characteristic of $R$ is prime. (I do not consider the trivial ring to be "simple", since it does not have exactly two ideals).

share|cite|improve this answer
Thank you! ${}$ – Lena Richman Jun 17 '12 at 6:17

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.