Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $a = \sum_k a_k X^k \in \mathbb C [\![ X ]\!]$ with $a_0 = 1$ and convergence radius $\rho_a > 0$. I want to show that the convergence radius of the inverse $b = \sum_k b_k X^k \in \mathbb C [\![ X ]\!]$ is also greater than 0. How can I do that?

share|cite|improve this question
are you looking at the inverse or at $1/a$ (the reciprocal)? – user20266 Jun 15 '12 at 17:19
Hi @Thomas: I know you can answer both questions! Why don't you undelete your answer? – Georges Elencwajg Jun 15 '12 at 18:10
It is my impression the OP does not know that holomorphic functions admit a power series representation but is looking for an answer using sequence manipulation. That I could, theoretically, also provide, but it is rather elaborate. Sure, I can undelete it. – user20266 Jun 15 '12 at 18:20
I'm looking for the inverse in the ring of formal power series, i.e. a $b = \sum_k b_k X^k$ such that $a b = 1$, where $1 = c = \sum_k c_k X^k$ means, that $c_0 = 1$ and $c_k = 0$ for $k \geq 1$. It's easy to find these $b_k \in \mathbb C$. But is it possible to argue directly for example with the formula from Hadamard for the convergence radius of power series? – aexl Jun 15 '12 at 23:56

$a$ defines a holomorphic function $f(z) =\sum a_k z^k $ in a neighbourhood of $0$. If you are interested in $g$ such that $f\circ g = id$ (the inverse of $f$), then you will need to make sure that $\frac{df}{dz}(0)= a_1\neq 0$. In that case, by the inverse function theorem it has, locally, a holomorphic inverse. Holomorphic implies positive radius of convergence.

A similar reasoning applies if you are interested in $g$ such that $f\cdot g=1$, the reciprocal. This is well defined near the origin if $a_0\neq 0$, so I guess you are aiming at this. As in the case of the inverse, the reciprocal is complex differentiable near the origin, hence holomorphic, hence admits a power series expansion with positve radius of convergence.

I do assume, however, that you are looking for a more basic reasoning not involving knowledge about holomorphic functions. It is possible (this was shown to me 30 years ago in my first lecture on analysis ;-) to recursively find expressions for the power series coefficients of $1/f= g$ by analyzing the equation $f\cdot g= 1$ and using uniqueness results about the coefficients of power series (the rhs being a trivial power series), which allow calculating the radius of convergence using the usual formula for it involving $|c_k|^{1/k}$. For now, I consider it a too tedious task to work out the details of this, my apologies.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.