Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I'm curious if there is some sort of distributive law for ideals.

If $I,J,K$ are ideals in an arbitrary ring, does $I(J+K)=IJ+IK$?

The containment "$\subset$" is pretty clear I think. But the opposite ontainment doesn't feel like it should work. I couldn't work out a counterexample with ideals in $\mathbb{Z}$ however. So does such an equality always hold or not?

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 7 down vote accepted

Note that if $A$, $B$, and $C$ are ideals, and $B\subseteq C$, then $AB\subseteq AC$; and if $A$ and $B$ are both contained in $C$, then $A+B\subseteq C$.

Since $J\subseteq J+K$, then $IJ\subseteq I(J+K)$. Since $K\subseteq J+K$, then $IK\subseteq I(J+K)$. Therefore, $IJ$ and $IK$ are both contained in $I(J+K)$, so $IJ+IK\subseteq I(J+K)$.

For the converse inclusion, a general element of $I(J+K)$ is of the form $$\sum a_i(j_i+k_i)$$ with $a_i\in I$, $j_i\in J$, and $k_i\in K$. And we have $$\sum a_i(j_i+k_i) = \sum\Bigl( a_ij_i + a_ik_i\Bigr) = \left( \sum a_ij_i\right) + \left(\sum a_ik_i\right) \in IJ + IK.$$

share|cite|improve this answer
Makes perfect sense, thanks. – chelsea cain Jun 15 '12 at 6:21

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.