Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $Aut(\mathbb{C}/\mathbb{Q})$ be the set of field automorphisms of $\mathbb{C}$ over $\mathbb{Q}$ (in short, all field automorphisms of $\mathbb{C}$). Let $x$ be an element of $\mathbb{C}$ such that the set $\{\sigma(x)|\sigma \in Aut(\mathbb{C}/\mathbb{Q})\}$ is finite. Is it true then that $x$ is algebraic over $\mathbb{Q}$ (and if so, why?) ?

It's being used in the following paper about elliptic curves to prove that a elliptic curve with complex multiplication has modular invariant $j$ which is algebraic over $\mathbb{Q}$:

Any help would be appreciated.

share|cite|improve this question
Note that this is only true if the axiom of choice is assumed: otherwise $Aut(\mathbb C)$ might, for example, be finite, hence every $x\in \mathbb C$ would satisfy your property. – Generic Human Jun 14 '12 at 11:55
up vote 1 down vote accepted

All the permutations of any transcendence basis can be lifted to an automorphism $\sigma$ of $\mathbb{C}$. The cardinality of any transcendence basis of $\mathbb{C}/\mathbb{Q}$ is uncountable. So if $x$ is transcendental over $\mathbb{Q}$, it can be included to a transcendence basis, and hence the set $$\{\sigma(x)\mid\sigma\in Aut(\mathbb{C})\}$$ would be uncountable. The claim follows.

share|cite|improve this answer
It is probably worth mentioning that the proof (and IIRC also the truth) of my first sentence depends on the axiom of choice. So if you don't accept choice you are in trouble. – Jyrki Lahtonen Jun 16 '14 at 6:47

The polynomial $f(y)=\prod (y-\sigma(x))$ is invariant under $Aut(\mathbb{C}/\mathbb{Q})$, hence its coeffecients must lie in $\mathbb{Q}$. (provided I remember my Galois theory correctly)

share|cite|improve this answer
I think that is only true when we consider a Galois extension no? – user38268 Jun 14 '12 at 11:51
As Generic Human comments, AC (or Zorn's lemma) is needed to prove that for each number $z\in\mathbb{C}\setminus\mathbb{Q}$ there is an automorphism $\sigma$ of $\mathbb{C}$ such that $\sigma(z)\neq z$. – Jyrki Lahtonen Jun 14 '12 at 12:17

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.