Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Considering a generic square matrix $A=(a_{i,j})$ we want to compute its inverse $A^{-1}=\left[a^{(-1)}_{i,j}\right]$.

Is there a way to express each $a^{(-1)}_{i,j}$ using a closed form expression?

share|cite|improve this question
Depends on what you mean by closed form. Cramer's rule involves det. – André Nicolas Jun 14 '12 at 2:29
Yeah by closed-form expression I mean a set of rules that involves elementary operations... For example, cofactors are calculated using minors, If I wanted to replace the cofactor term in the relation with an expression, how would it be... What I'd like to reach is a final formula not involving more steps to calculate the final quantity. Maybe it is not possible, just want a confirmation of this if possible. – Andry Jun 14 '12 at 2:46
up vote 2 down vote accepted

The $ij$ entry of $A^{-1}$ is $(-1)^{i+j}$ times the determinant of the matrix $C_{ji}$ obtained by deleting row $j$ and column $i$ from $A$, all divided by the determinant of $A$. I don't know whether you consider that to be a closed form.

share|cite|improve this answer
Since the formula is a rational function in the entries of $A$, it should be good :) – N. S. Jun 14 '12 at 2:48

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.