Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I recently watched some measure theory lectures online. They didn't post lecture notes and I can't find which video exactly it was.

I think there was a theorem that goes something along the lines of:

If $f:\mathbb{R^N} \to \mathbb{R^N}$ is Lipshitz with Lipschitz constant $L$, and $\lambda$ stands for Lebesgue measure, then $\lambda(f(A)) \leq L\lambda(A)$ for $A$ measurable.

Is this correct, or is there a similar looking theorem that I might be thinking of? Thanks.

share|improve this question
1  
Yes, it's correct, although the proof I know uses Hausdorff measure. –  Jose27 Jun 14 '12 at 1:18
    
Does it have a name, or do you have a link to it? The proof I remember involved Hausdorff measure too. –  nullUser Jun 14 '12 at 1:25
    
I don't have a reference, although, when $\lambda(A)=0$ this is called Luzin's N property for Lipschitz maps. –  Jose27 Jun 14 '12 at 1:34
1  
Theorem 7.5 in Geometry of sets and measures in Euclidean spaces by Pertti Mattila, a highly recommended book for everyone who is interested in anything that involves maps and measures. –  user31373 Jun 14 '12 at 2:27

1 Answer 1

up vote 1 down vote accepted

Just posting this in case others search for it later. As @Leonid mentioned, here is the theorem from Geometry of sets and measures in Euclidean spaces by Pertti Mattila:

7.5. Theorem. If $f:\mathbb{R}^m \to \mathbb{R}^n$ is a Lipschitz map, $0 \leq s \leq m$, and $A \subset \mathbb{R}^m$, then $$\mathcal{H}^s(f(A)) \leq \mathrm{Lip}(f)^s\mathcal{H}^s(A).$$ In particular, $$\dim(f(A)) \leq \dim(A).$$

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.