Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I learned electrodynamics. According to the vector potential determination, $$ \mathbf B = [\nabla \times \mathbf A ], $$ Coulomb gauge, $$ \nabla \mathbf A = 0, $$ and one of Maxwell's equations, $$ [\nabla \times \mathbf B ] = \frac{1}{c}4\pi \mathbf j, $$

I can assume, that

$$ [\nabla \times \mathbf B ] = \nabla (\nabla \mathbf A) - \Delta \mathbf A = -\Delta \mathbf A = \frac{1}{c}4 \pi \mathbf j. $$ How to prove that the one of the solutions of this equation is solution like newtonian potential, $$ \mathbf A = \frac{1}{c}\int \limits_{V} \frac{\mathbf j (r) d^{3}\mathbf r}{|\mathbf r - \mathbf r_{0}|}? $$

share|improve this question
1  
The usual procedure is to find the solution of $\Delta A(r) = \delta(r)$ (the green function of the equation) and to make a convolution with the inhomogeneous part. In this case it seems that the green function in $1/|r|$. –  guaraqe Jun 13 '12 at 22:55
    
I don't know about the Green function, because I don't study math on this level. Can you explain if it won't be hard? –  John Taylor Jun 13 '12 at 23:03
    
It is based on Fourier transform, do you know it? –  guaraqe Jun 13 '12 at 23:14
    
Yes, I know it. –  John Taylor Jun 14 '12 at 9:36

1 Answer 1

up vote 1 down vote accepted

Skipping the part about the Green's function, you should apply Fourier transformation on your equation

$$-\Delta \mathbf A = \frac{1}{c}4 \pi \mathbf j.$$

to change it into

$$k^2 \tilde{\mathbf{A}} = \frac{1}{c}4 \pi \tilde{\mathbf{j}}$$

or

$$\tilde{\mathbf{A}} = \frac{1}{c}4 \pi \tilde{\mathbf{j}}\cdot\frac{1}{k^2}$$

The left hand side is a product, so the inverse Fourier transform will be a convolution. The inverse Fourier transform of $1/k^2$ is $1/|r|$ in 3D, as you can see in formula 502. Therefore one gets

$$\mathbf A = \frac{1}{c}\int \limits_{V} \frac{\mathbf j (r) d^{3}\mathbf r}{|\mathbf r - \mathbf r_{0}|} \; .$$

share|improve this answer
    
From a mathematician's viewpoint, a cleaner approach would be to insert $\mathbf{A}$ into the equations and check. Fourier analysis requires assumptions that might be heavier than those for being a pointwise solution. –  Siminore Jun 18 '12 at 11:06
    
Sure, but I used Fourier analysis precisely because the OP knows it. –  Raskolnikov Jun 18 '12 at 11:07
    
I understand. But also direct differentiation might be a good exercise. –  Siminore Jun 18 '12 at 11:09

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.