Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Let $R$ be a commutative unital ring and let $M$ be an $R$-module and let $S$ be a multiplicative subset of $R$.

Today I proved both of the following: $$ S^{-1} R\otimes_R S^{-1}M \cong S^{-1} M$$ and $$ S^{-1} R \otimes M \cong S^{-1} M$$

Now I'm slightly confused. Either my proofs are wrong or $C \otimes A \cong C \otimes B$ does not imply $A \cong B$. But I can't come up with an example. Can someone give me an example? (Or tell me that my proofs are wrong.)

share|improve this question
13  
Well, if nothing else, $C\otimes A$ and $C\otimes B$ can both be trivial. For example, tensoring $\mathbb{Z}_2$ with $\mathbb{Q}$ or $\mathbb{R}$ will kill it, but $\mathbb{Q}$ and $\mathbb{R}$ certainly aren't isomorphic. –  Miha Habič Jun 13 '12 at 19:24
4  
If you're interested in cases where this does work, look up examples of faithful flatness. –  Dylan Moreland Jun 13 '12 at 19:30
1  
I don't think your first isomorphism can be right. When $R$ is a domain and $S^{-1}R=K$ is its field of fractions, $S^{-1}M$ should be the extension of scalars of $M$ to $K$; in your first isomorphism you claim that restricting scalars to $R$ then extending again to $K$ gives the same thing; however, even comparing dimensions should show this is false. Maybe I don't understand what's hidden in your notation, or maybe I'm confusing myself. –  vgty6h7uij Jun 13 '12 at 19:30
1  
@vgty6h7uij: $R\to S^{-1}R$ is epic, so tensoring over $R$ and $S^{-1}R$ is the same for $S^{-1}R$ modules. Try it for $R=\mathbb{Z}$ and $S^{-1}R=\mathbb{Q}$ to see how the fractions just slide around once you already assume you have $\mathbb{Q}$-modules. –  Jack Schmidt Jun 13 '12 at 19:45
1  
This isn't constructive at all, but I just love the terminology: $R\to S^{-1}R$ is EPIC!! –  Miha Habič Jun 13 '12 at 19:48

1 Answer 1

up vote 5 down vote accepted

You are correct in noticing that tensoring with a fixed module isn't an injective operation. Various things can go wrong; probably the simplest thing to notice is that tensoring can kill torsion. To repeat the example given in the comments, both $\mathbb{Z}_2\otimes \mathbb{Q}$ and $\mathbb{Z}_2\otimes\mathbb{R}$ (everything in sight is a $\mathbb{Z}$-module) are trivial, while $\mathbb{Q}$ and $\mathbb{R}$ aren't isomorphic. There is a multitude of examples in the same vein, e.g. tensoring any two finitely generated $\mathbb{Z}$-modules of the same rank with $\mathbb{Q}$ will produce isomorphic modules.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.