Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I can show that if $E$ is compact and Hausdorff $B$ has the same properties, also I can show that if $B$ is compact and Hausdorff $E$ is Hausdorff, but I have troubles trying to prove that $E$ is also compact. Any suggestions would be appreciated.

I would like to know if there is a short way or at least a simple way to show that if E is Hausdorff so is B, I can prove it but I have to make a lot of observations and I get a really really long demostration.

This is an exercise in Hatcher (Algebraic Topology) Section 1.3, exercise 3

share|cite|improve this question
You might also want to try doing the exercise making extensive use of ultra filters. Although they are not needed here, the resulting proof can be made much shorter. – Alexander Thumm Jun 12 '12 at 5:10
up vote 12 down vote accepted

I'll try to answer the question without saying too much so that you can still work on it. I can edit my answer to give a complete solution if need be.

Let $\mathcal{U}$ be an open cover of $E$. Then for each $x\in B$ there exist $p^{-1}(x)$ is finite. Thus we can choose $U^x_1,\ldots, U^x_{n_x}\in\mathcal{U}$ such that $p^{-1}(x)$ is in the union of these sets.

Hints: Look at the image of $U^x_1,\ldots,U^x_{n_x}$ under $p$. Can you get an open set of $B$ from this containing $x$? How can you use this to get an open cover of $B$? How do you extract an open cover of $E$ from this information?

share|cite|improve this answer
Well, For any $x \in B$ I can get an evenly covered neighborhood $U_{x}$ so its inverse image is a finite union of open sets homeomorphic to $U_{x}$, $\bigcup_{k=1}^{n_{x}} A_{k}$; for each $k$, there is an unique element $ y_{k} \in A_{k}$ such that $p(y_{k})=x$. For each $y_{k}$ there is also an open set $S_{k}$ in the cover with $y_{k} \in S_{k}$, so restricting $p$ to $S_{k} \cap A_{k}$ i get an homeomorphism between $S_{k} \cap A_{k}$ and an open set contained in $U_{x}$. – Frank Jun 12 '12 at 4:12
By taking direct image of these open sets I can get an open cover of $B$, so I can take a finite subcover, the problem is how to extract t open cover of E when I take inverse image of this finite subcover? Do I have to modify the cover first? – Frank Jun 12 '12 at 4:12
For a fixed $x\in B$, consider the images $p(S_k\cap A_k)$. As you have said these are all open in $B$. What do you know about their intersection (I repeat, for the moment, $x$ is fixed)? Is it open? Is it nonempty? If we call this intersection $V_x$, what can we say about its preimage, $p^{-1}(V_x)$? – J. Loreaux Jun 12 '12 at 5:21
The intersection is open and obviously not empty because $x$ belongs to all of them. So with those intersections I create the open cover for $B$ right? Then when I take the inverse image of each open set in the finite subcover I get a finite union of open sets and each one is contained in at least one element of the initial cover. Finally I have obtained my finite subcover! Thanks a lot! – Frank Jun 12 '12 at 5:30
Good work, glad you got it. – J. Loreaux Jun 12 '12 at 12:10

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.