Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I've got the following problem... We are given a sequence of integers $n_k\to+\infty$ as $k\to\infty$. Then we define $$A:=\{x\in[0,2\pi]\,\colon\,\lim_{k\to\infty}\sin(n_kx) \text{ exists}\}.$$

I have to prove now that $\operatorname{meas}(A)=0$, where the measure is the usual Lebesgue measure on the real line.

I've proved the following relation which I assume can be useful for the sequel, namely for any measurable $B\subseteq A$, setting $$f(x):=\lim_{k\to\infty}\sin(n_kx),$$ it follows $$\int_B 2(f(x))^2\mathrm dx=\lim_{k\to\infty}\int_B1-\cos(n_kx)\mathrm dx=\operatorname{meas}(B).$$ Then $A$ is measurable (I have proved it), so I want to apply the previous result: my plan is to show that $f(x)$ must be almost everywhere $0$ but I cannot see a neat argument.

Another strategy I've thought about would be to reason by contradiction and see what happen if $A$ has strictly positive measure. At any rate this way seems nice to me because the result in this case would imply that $f$ must be equal to $0$ almost everywhere on $A$ in contrast with the previous way which uses this conclusion as the starting assumption.

In any case, I've spent quite a lot of time on this without success, so I'm asking you to help me...

thanks for your patience


share|cite|improve this question
I think it suffices to prove that if $\lim\sin(n_k x)$ exists then it is zero. You can argue this by contradiction. Then it's fairly clear that $A$ has measure zero, since it's merely a countable set of points. If anything's unclear let me know, and I'll write it up in full below! – Edward Hughes Jun 11 '12 at 12:49
but what if, for example, $n_k=4k+1$ and $x=\frac\pi2$? In this case the limit exists and it is constantly $1$ so I cannot claim that if the limit exists then it is $0$. I don't get your point sorry... – guido giuliani Jun 11 '12 at 13:11
Oh yes damn, sorry that doesn't work. I think I was halfway to something more like Siminore has written below, but didn't quite think it through! – Edward Hughes Jun 11 '12 at 13:29
up vote 1 down vote accepted

Here is a sketch of the proof, as suggested by W. Rudin in his "Real and Complex Analysis".

  1. Prove that $$\lim_{n \to +\infty} \int_E \sin nx \, dx = \lim_{n \to +\infty} \int_E \cos nx \, dx =0$$ for every measurable subset $E$ of $[0,2\pi]$. Hint: Riemann-Lebesgue.
  2. Assume that the subsequence $\{\sin n_k x\}_k$ converges. Since $2 \sin^2 \alpha = 1 -\cos 2\alpha$, we deduce from the previous step that $\sin n_k x \to \pm \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}$ almost everywhere.

Can you complete the proof?

share|cite|improve this answer
you mean... $\sin(n_kx)\to\pm\frac{1}{\sqrt2}$? – guido giuliani Jun 11 '12 at 13:27
@guidogiuliani: Yes, it was a misprint on the french translation of the book. – Siminore Jun 11 '12 at 13:50

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.