Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

In Griffiths and Morgan's book "Rational Homotopy Theory and differential forms", pages 154-158, they give an example of a computation in de Rham cohomology of the minimal model of a DGA using Massey products in the complement of the (fattened up) Borromean rings in $S^3$.

A key technical ingredient in this computation is the assertion that the coboundary of the Thom class $U_N$ of the normal bundle of a submanifold $N$ with boundary $\partial N$ is the Thom class $U_{\partial N}$ of the normal bundle of that boundary: $$ \delta U_N = U_{\partial N}.$$

What I am wondering is if anyone knows of a reference for this result or even some indication of whether or not this is hard?

Note: All Thom classes are extended by zero outside their supports.

share|cite|improve this question

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.