Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I saw papers saying something like "let $\gamma:S^1 \times [0,T] \to \mathbb{R}^2$ parametrise a curve. The second interval above just makes it time dependent, but why parametrise (for fixed time) the curve on S^1, the unit circle? I think it's to make it closed but what is confusing is that in papers they write $\gamma$ a function of a real variable $u$ and $t$, so as $\gamma(u, t)$ so how can the domain of the first variable $u$ be the unit circle? Should it not be $\gamma(u, v, t)$ for $u^2 + v^2 = 1$?

Thanks

share|improve this question
add comment

2 Answers 2

up vote 3 down vote accepted

As you observe, it forces the curve to be closed without them needing to say it. The variables in a function don't need to be standard coordinates on $\mathbb{R}^n$ either - a circle is $1$-dimensional, so a single coordinate $u$ is perfectly good. Maybe it would help to think of $u$ as the angle round the circle (remembering that $u=a$ and $u=a+2\pi$ define the same point, so $\gamma(a,t)=\gamma(a+2\pi,t)$ for all $t$ and $a$). This isn't strictly accurate because I've now redefined $u$ as being a real number (and $\gamma$ as being $2\pi$-periodic in its first variable), rather than $u$ being a point on the circle, but if you're used to functions taking real inputs it might be helpful.

Note: The value $t$ in Thomas's answer is precisely this angle in his parameterization of the circle. This is not the only way of parameterizing a circle by one variable though, which is why philosophically it's cleaner to just take $u$ to be a point in the circle.

share|improve this answer
add comment

People often think of $S^1$ as the image of $t \mapsto e^{it}$ and then identify this with $t$. Using the exponential that way one also often identifies $[0,2\pi]$ (sometimes $[0,1]$ then with different speed of course) with $S^1$ (identifying the boundary points) more or less explicitly and then works with parameters from the interval. As long as only a parameter for a closed curve is needed and geometric poperties of the source are not relevant this works fine, and it's easier to write down derivatives.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.