Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I have these two questions that I cannot get any intuition about. Perhaps someone can possibly offer a few hints on how to get started?

1) Show that the ends of ${\bf F_2} \oplus {\bf F_2}$ is equal to 1 (i.e, $e({\bf F_2} \oplus {\bf F_2}) =1$). The reason this is confusing me is because $e({\bf F_2}) = \infty$, so I do not know how my question is equal to 1.

2) Let $G$ be a finitely generated group with $e(G)=2$ and $\lambda$ be its cayley graph. There exists a finite subgraph $C$ such that $\lambda$ \ $C$ has exactly two connected, unbounded components. We choose one of these two complements, and now let $E \subset G$ consist of the elements of $G$ that correspond to the vertices in a connected component that is unbounded. Note that $g \in G$. I need to show that: either $E \triangle gE$ is finite or $(E \triangle gE)^{c}$ is finite.

Any help would be great.

share|cite|improve this question

Let me give you a rough idea of how to prove 1). Presumably ${\bf F_2}$ is the free group of rank 2? We have to show that two points in the Cayley graph of ${\bf F_2} \oplus {\bf F_2}$ at distance at least $n$ from the origin can be connected by a path that stays at distance at least $n$ from the origin. Let the two points be $(g_1,h_1)$, $(g_2,h_2)$, and let $g$ be any element of ${\bf F_2}$ that has length at least $n$. Then we use the path

$(g_1,h_1) \to (g,h_1) \to (g,h_2) \to (g_2,h_2)$,

where, in each component of the path, one of the co-ordinate elements stays constant.

I don't think you have stated 2) very clearly. You introduced a symbol $\lambda$ and then never used it. Connected component of what? You cannot mean $\lambda$, because that is connected!

Added later: Hints for 2). Let the two unbounded connected components of $\lambda \setminus C$ be $E=E_1,E_2$, where $\lambda \setminus(E_1 \cup E_2)$ is finite. Now $\lambda \setminus (gC \cup g^{-1}C)$ also has exactly two infinite unbounded connected components $F_1,F_2$ with $\lambda \setminus(F_1 \cup F_2)$ finite, and we can assume that $F_1 \subset E_1$, $F_2 \subset E_2$.

Now any two points in $gF_1$ are in the same connected component of $\lambda \setminus C$, and similarly for $gF_2$. So we must either have $gF_1 \subset E_1$, $gF_2 \subset E_2$, or $gF_1 \subset E_2$, $gF_2 \subset E_1$.

share|cite|improve this answer
@Derek..I added some more info about $E$. Does this look better? – Selena Jun 11 '12 at 1:02

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.