Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Possible Duplicate:
Why does this process, when iterated, tend towards a certain number? (the golden ratio?)

Please post your favorit solution to the following

Compute $x=1+\cfrac{1}{1+\cfrac{1}{1+\cfrac{1}{1+\ldots}}}$

Thank you

share|cite|improve this question

marked as duplicate by J. M., Jyrki Lahtonen, The Chaz 2.0, Qiaochu Yuan Jun 9 '12 at 18:39

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

The answers from your other question can be adapted to this problem. – J. M. Jun 9 '12 at 16:56
You might have heard of golden This might be interesting for you . – Theorem Jun 9 '12 at 16:57
up vote 3 down vote accepted

Denote by $x=1+\frac{1}{1+\frac{1}{1+\frac{1}{1+\ldots}}}$. Because the fraction goes on forever, the denominator of the second term in the RHS is identical to $x$. Thus, we have $x=1+1/x$ or the same as $x^2=1+x$. Thus, $x=\frac{\sqrt 5-1}{2}$.

share|cite|improve this answer
Strictly speaking, you need to show that the continued fraction converges. (Fortunately this is not hard. The Banach fixed point theorem, for example, will take care of it.) – Qiaochu Yuan Jun 9 '12 at 16:57
Your stated value of $x = (\sqrt{5}-1)/2$ is smaller than 1. – Erick Wong Jun 9 '12 at 17:45
The value of $x$ you give does not solve the equation, rather it satifies $x^2=1-x$. Did you mean $x=(1-\sqrt5)/2$, which does solve the equation? Indeed, even though the latter value is negative, the supposition that $1+\frac{1}{1+\frac{1}{1+\frac{1}{1+\ldots}}}$ denotes this value is consistent. Conventionally however such continued fractions are taken to denote the positive solution of the quadratic equation, can you see why? – Marc van Leeuwen Jun 10 '12 at 19:50
This is definitely not a good explanation/solution of the problem. (-1). "goes on forever" is not a satisfactory term here. – Pedro Tamaroff Jun 11 '12 at 2:46

Look at the equation $$x^2-x-1=0$$

It is clear is solution is not zero. Thus, write


This is equivalent to

$$x=1+\frac 1 x$$

Using this recursively

$$x=1+\frac 1 {1+\frac 1 x}$$

Thus, define $\{ x_n\} $ recursively as $x_0=1$ and $x_n=1+\dfrac{1}{x_{n-1}}$

Show the sequence is positive, increasing for $n>3$ and bounded, thus it converges to $\ell$. You can then show that $\lim x_n=\ell = x$, where $x$ is the positive solution of the first equation discussed, namely

$$\phi = \frac{\sqrt 5 +1}{2}$$

share|cite|improve this answer

Here is another, more pedestrian, and sketchy, way of doing this:

Let the sequence $\frac{p_n}{q_n}$ be defined as follows:


$$\frac{p_n}{q_n}=1+\frac 1{\frac{p_{n-1}}{q_{n-1}}} = \frac{p_{n-1}+q_{n-1}}{p_{n-1}}$$

It is clear that this computes terminated versions of the continued fraction and we have $$q_n=p_{n-1} \text{ and } p_n=p_{n-1}+q_{n-1}=p_{n-1}+p_{n-2}$$

It follows that numerator and denominator are successive Fibonacci numbers, and the limit ratio is the golden ratio.

There is an efficient discussion of continued fractions in Hardy & Wright "An Introduction to the Theory of Numbers" which shows that successive estimates from terminated fractions lie either side of the limit and converge to it.

share|cite|improve this answer
"terminated versions of the continued fraction" - convergents is the usual term of art. Basically, one is saying here that the $n$-th convergent of the continued fraction is $\dfrac{F_{n+1}}{F_n}$. For proving that the limit of that as $n\to\infty$ is $\phi$, see this. – J. M. Jun 9 '12 at 18:15

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.