Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

If $\mu(A) <\infty $, then from almost everywhere convergence follows the convergence in the measure . I don't understand what the "convergence in the measure" means. Waiting for your explanation.

I am trying to understand proposition 2 from the following link :


share|cite|improve this question
Please provide some context, where is this statement taken from? etc. – Asaf Karagila Jun 8 '12 at 10:41
Wikipedia is waiting for you! – Sangchul Lee Jun 8 '12 at 10:41
@AsafKaragila : I have posted the reference. Would like to hear some explanation. – Theorem Jun 8 '12 at 10:50
up vote 3 down vote accepted

The proposition says that if $(X,\mu)$ is a measure space, and $\mu(X)$ is finite, then:

Whenever $f_n$ is a sequence of real valued functions such that for almost all $x\in X$ we have $\lim f_n(x)=f(x)$ for some $f$,

Then for every $\varepsilon>0$ the measure of the sets $E_n=\left\{x\in X: |f_n(x)-f(x)|>\varepsilon\right\}$ approach zero, that is $\lim\limits_n\mu(E_n)=0$.

The first type of convergence is called "almost everywhere convergence" and the second type is called "convergence in measure". The proposition tells us that for finite-measure spaces one implies the other.

share|cite|improve this answer

We say that a sequence of functions $f_{n}:A\to \mathbb{R}$ converges to a function $f:A\to\mathbb{R}$ in measure, if for every $\varepsilon>0$ we have \begin{equation*} \lim_{n\to\infty}\mu(\{x\in A:|f_{n}(x)-f(x)|>\varepsilon\})=0. \end{equation*} So the statement says that if $\mu(A)<\infty$ then a.e. convergence implies convergence in measure as defined above.

Edit: I didn't look in every detail the proof that you gave, but here's a simple way to see it by using Fatou's reverse Lemma for measurable sets, which requires the finiteness of $\mu(A)$ since its proof uses convergence of measure for decreasing sequence of sets. Note that \begin{align*} \{x\in A:\lim_{n\to\infty}f_{n}(x)=f(x)\} &=\{x\in A:\forall n\in\mathbb{N}\exists m\in\mathbb{N}\,\,s.t.\,\,\forall i\geq m\,\,|f_{i}(x)-f(x)|\leq \frac{1}{n}\}\\ &=\bigcap_{n=1}^{\infty}\bigcup_{m=1}^{\infty}\bigcap_{i\geq m}\{x\in A:|f_{i}(x)-f(x)|\leq \frac{1}{n}\}. \end{align*} So if $f_{n}\to f$ a.e. then the complement of the above set has measure zero, whence by de-morgan's law \begin{align*} 0 &=\mu\Big(\bigcup_{n=1}^{\infty}\bigcap_{m=1}^{\infty}\bigcup_{i\geq m}\{x\in A:|f_{i}(x)-f(x)|> \frac{1}{n}\}\Big) \overset{\forall n\in\mathbb{N}}{\geq}\mu\Big(\bigcap_{m=1}^{\infty}\bigcup_{i\geq m}\{x\in A:|f_{i}(x)-f(x)|> \frac{1}{n}\}\Big) \\ &=\mu\Big(\limsup_{i\to\infty}\{x\in A:|f_{i}(x)-f(x)|> \frac{1}{n}\}\Big)\overset{Fatou}{\geq} \limsup_{i\to\infty}\,\mu(\{x\in A:|f_{i}(x)-f(x)|> \frac{1}{n}\}) \\ &\geq \liminf_{i\to\infty}\,\mu(\{x\in A:|f_{i}(x)-f(x)|> \frac{1}{n}\})\geq 0. \end{align*} So there in fact holds an equality everywhere, and in particular \begin{equation*} \lim_{i\to\infty}\mu(\{x\in A:|f_{i}(x)-f(x)|>\frac{1}{n}\})=0 \end{equation*} for all $n\in\mathbb{N}$, from which it follows that $f_{n}\to f$ in measure.

share|cite|improve this answer
Thank you very much. Can you explain me how u changed from $limsup$ to $liminf$ towards the last step ? – Theorem Jun 8 '12 at 14:10
@Ananda: for any sequence $(a_{n})_{n=1}^{\infty}$ of real numbers we have $\limsup\, a_{n}\geq \liminf\, a_{n}$, so I just applied this to the above line. – T. Eskin Jun 8 '12 at 15:03

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.