Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Does the first-order ODE $$\bigl(g_2(x)y^2+g_1(x)y+g_0(x)\bigr)y'=f_3(x)y^3+f_2(x)y^2+f_1(x)y+f_0(x),$$ where $g_2(x)\neq0$ and $f_0(x)$ , $f_1(x)$ , $f_2(x)$ , $f_3(x)$ are not both equal to $0$, be possible to transform to a first-order ODE which is of the form $y_1'=\sum_{k=0}^nh_k(x_1)y_1^k$ , where $n$ is as small as possible?

I start my motivation by considering the first-order ODE $$\bigl(g_1(x)y+g_0(x)\bigr)y'=f_3(x)y^3+f_2(x)y^2+f_1(x)y+f_0(x),$$ where $g_1(x)\neq0$ and $f_0(x)$ , $f_1(x)$ , $f_2(x)$ , $f_3(x)$ are not both equal to $0$ first, the effect is quite directly perceived through the senses since just let $u=y+\dfrac{g_0(x)}{g_1(x)}$ and then let $u=\dfrac{1}{y_1}$ , $x=x_1$ is OK.

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 2 down vote accepted

Write the original DE as $Q(x,y) y' = P(x,y)$ where $P$ and $Q$ are polynomials in $y$; we may assume they are relatively prime. Consider a new independent variable $v$ defined by $v = G(x,y)$, where we may try for $G$ that is a nonconstant polynomial in $y$. We want this to satisfy a differential equation $v' = R(x,v)$ where $R$ is a polynomial in $v$.

Let's work backwards: start with the DE $v' = R(x,v)$ and define $y$ implicitly by $v = G(x,y)$ where $G$ is a nonconstant polynomial in $y$.
Then $v' = G_x + G_y y' = R(x,G(x,y))$ so $y$ satisfies the differential equation $y = \dfrac{(R(x,G(x,y)) - G_x(x,y))}{G_y(x,y)} = \dfrac{P(x,y)}{Q(x,y)}$ where for some $H(x,y)$, $H(x,y) P(x,y) = R(x,G(x,y)) - G_x(x,y)$ and $H(x,y) Q(x,y) = G_y(x,y)$.

Can we take $H(x,y) = 1$? If $G_y = Q$ is a quadratic in $y$, $G$ is a cubic in $y$, and $G_x$ is either cubic or quadratic. Thus for $P$ to be cubic in $y$, $R(x,G(x,y))$ is at most cubic in $y$. But since $G$ is cubic in $y$, $R(x,v)$ must be at most linear in $v$, say $R(x,v) = \alpha(x) + \beta(x) v$. Then $P(x,y) = \alpha(x) + \beta(x) G(x,y) - G_x(x,y)$ and $Q(x,y) = G_y(x,y)$. This defines one family of solutions. For example, with $\alpha(x) = \beta(x) = 1$ and $G(x,y) = x y + y^3$, we have $P(x,y) = 1 + (x-1) y + y^3$, $Q(x,y) = x + 3 y^2$; the substitution $v = x y + y^3$ transforms $y' = \dfrac{1+(x-1) y + y^3}{x+3y^2}$ into $v' = v + 1$. So at least in some cases this transformation is possible.

More generally, if $H$ is of degree $d$ in $y$, then $G_y$ is of degree $2+d$ and $G$ is of degree $3+d$, and $R(x,G(x,y))$ is of degree at most $3+d$, so again $R$ must be at most linear. If $R(x,v) = \alpha(x) + \beta(x) v$, $H(x,y)$ must divide both $G_y(x,y)$ and $\alpha(x) + \beta(x) G(x,y) - G_x(x,y)$. For example, we might try $H(x,y) = y$ with $G(x,y) = g_0(x) + g_2(x) y^2 + g_3(x) y^3 + g_4(x) y^4$ where $\alpha(x) + \beta(x) g_0(x) - g_0'(x) = 0$, obtaining $P(x,y) = (\beta(x) g_4(x) - g_4'(x)) y^3 + (\beta(x) g_3(x) - g_3'(x)) y^2 + (\beta(x) g_2(x) - g_2'(x)) y$ and $Q(x,y) = 4 g_4(x) y^2 + 3 g_3(x) y + 2 g_2(x)$.

EDIT: If there is a transformation to $v' = R(x,v)$ where $v$ is linear, a further transformation $u = a(x) + b(x) v$ will make the differential equation $u' = 0$, so we may as well assume $R(x,v) = 0$. But that is equivalent to saying $H(x,y)$ is an integrating factor for the differential equation $P(x,y) - Q(x,y) y' = 0$. The necessary and sufficient condition for $H(x,y)$ to be an integrating factor is that $(P H)_y = -(Q H)_x$. There is an integrating factor of the form $H(x)$ iff $(P_y + Q_x)/Q$ is a function of $x$ only. I don't know of a nice necessary and sufficient condition for having an integrating factor of the form $\sum_{j=0}^d h_j(x) y^j$.

share|cite|improve this answer
Your idea is really great, but can you reverse your process so that to determine the relationships between $f_0(x)$ , $f_1(x)$ , $f_2(x)$ , $f_3(x)$ , $g_0(x)$ , $g_1(x)$ , $g_2(x)$ in the orginal ODE which is at most possible to transform to linear ODE, Riccati Equation, Abel equation of the first kind, ...... respectively? – doraemonpaul Jun 9 '12 at 1:09

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.