Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I have a functor and a prefunctor (not a functor) "in the inverse direction".

Can the notion of adjunction be generalized for prefunctors?

I remind that a prefunctor is a functor without the requirement to preserve identities (that is a prefunctor is required to preserve composition but not identities).

@Egbert asked me to describe my situation in more details. So I do below.

My real setting is the following: $(\mathsf{FCD})$ is a functor from the category $\mathsf{RLD}$ to the category $\mathsf{FCD}$ (see this preprint for definition of these categories and functions); $(\mathsf{RLD})_{\mathrm{in}}$ is a prefunctor (not a functor) from the category $\mathsf{FCD}$ to the category $\mathsf{RLD}$. I suspect that $(\mathsf{FCD})$ and $(\mathsf{RLD})_{\mathrm{in}}$ may be in some sense adjoint (but I've seen a definition of adjoints only for functors not for prefunctors).

share|cite|improve this question
You can define an adjunction in any bicategory. For example, there are adjunctions in the bicategory of categories and profunctors, in the bicategory of spans of categories, etc. – Zhen Lin Jun 5 '12 at 18:06
When this was homework we would ask questions like: what is the setting? What do you exactly mean by prefunctors? What have you tried and where did you get stuck? I think these are also relevant questions here. For the best possible answer, please try to be a bit more descriptive. – Egbert Jun 5 '12 at 19:11
@Egbert: I've edited the question. – porton Jun 5 '12 at 19:25

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.