Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Smooth classic entropies generalize the standard notions of entropy. This smoothing stands for a minimization/maximization over all events $\Omega$ such that $p(\Omega)\geq 1-\varepsilon$ for a given $\varepsilon\geq 0$. The smooth max and min entropy are defined as:

\begin{equation} H_\infty^\varepsilon (X)= \max_\Omega \min_x(-\log p_{X\Omega}(x)) \end{equation}

\begin{equation} H_0^\varepsilon (X)= \min_\Omega\log \left| x:p_{X\Omega}(x)>0\right| \end{equation}

where $p_{X\Omega}(x)$ is the probability that the event $\Omega$ takes place and $X$ takes the value $x$.

So my question would be, given a specific discrete distribution, for instance something as simple as a fair coin, could someone explicitly compute an example of its smooth max and min entropy?

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 3 down vote accepted

I will refer you to this great informal introduction which gives a few finite examples and explains the intuition behind the definitions.

However $H_\infty^\varepsilon$ is not mentioned. The effect of smoothing is similar to $H_0^\varepsilon$, but in reverse: the smoothing will continuously "steal" probability from the most probable states until $\varepsilon$ probability has been stolen. If you have $n$ maximum-probability states and all other states are somewhat less probable, then the maximum probability will be reduced by $\varepsilon/n$. So a single small peak of probability will be smoothed off, but the effect of smoothing will be negligible in two notable cases: if you have many maximum-probability (or close to maximum-probability) states, or if the maximum probability is much greater than $\varepsilon$.

Unlike $H_0^\varepsilon$ which can be radically different from $H_0$, $H_\infty^\varepsilon$ is continuous in $\varepsilon$ in the following sense: $$0<\exp(-H_\infty(X))-\exp(-H_\infty^\varepsilon(X))\le \varepsilon$$ (more generally, $\exp(-H_\infty^\varepsilon(X))$ is an increasing 1-Lipschitz function of $\varepsilon$).

Finally, for a fair coin: $$H_\infty^\varepsilon(X)=-\log \frac{1-\varepsilon}{2}$$ $$H_0^\varepsilon(X)=\begin{cases}\log 2&\varepsilon<1/2\\0&\varepsilon\ge 1/2\end{cases}$$ $H_\infty^\varepsilon$ steals $\varepsilon/2$ from each state since they have both maximal probability. $H_0^\varepsilon$ tries to steal from one minimum-probability state to reduce the number of states: this only succeeds if $\varepsilon\ge 1/2$.

share|cite|improve this answer
Then, for a fair coin $H_0^\epsilon(X)=H_0(X)=1$? – Euclean Jun 7 '12 at 9:08
In fact this is only true for small enough $\varepsilon$ (specifically, $\varepsilon<1/2$): I updated my answer. – Generic Human Jun 8 '12 at 12:40
Ok, for $\epsilon>1/2$, that is, once you are allowed to still more than 1/2 your fair coin is $\epsilon$-close to a deterministic distribution with 0 entropy. A little late, but I think I got a good understanding! – Euclean Jul 4 '12 at 10:24

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.