Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Let be $\mathcal F$ a presheaf on a topological space $X$, the usual definition of the sheaf associated to $\mathcal F$ is the following

$\mathcal F^+(U)=\{\widetilde s: U\rightarrow Et(\mathcal F)\;|\; s\in \mathcal F(U),\;\textrm{and}\;\widetilde s(x)=s_x \}$

where $s_x$ is the germ at $x$ of $s$.

In the book "Algebraic geometry: an introduction - D.Perrin ", I have found another definition of the sheaf associated to a presheaf in the particular case of sheaves of functions.

Let be $\mathcal F$ a presheaf (on $X$) of functions with codomain the set $A$ then

$\mathcal F^+(U)=\{f:U\rightarrow A\;|\;\forall x\in U, \exists V\subseteq U\; \textrm{where $V$ is an open set containing $x$ and}\; \exists g\in\mathcal F(V)\;\textrm{such that}\; f|_V=g\}$

My question is the foillowing: why, in the case of sheaves of function, these definitions are the same? The nature of the elements of $\mathcal F^+(U)$ is different, infact in the first case we have function from $U$ to $Et(\mathcal F)$ instead in the second case the codomain is $A$.

share|improve this question

1 Answer 1

up vote 3 down vote accepted

If $\mathcal F$ is a presheaf of sets on a topological space $X$, the etale space construction shows that you can interpret $\mathcal F$ as a presheaf of continuous functions into the topological splace $Et(\mathcal F)$ :

If $s \in \mathcal F(U)$, you associate it to the function $\widetilde{s} : x \in U\mapsto s_x \in Et(\mathcal F)$. Write $\widetilde {\mathcal F}(U) = \{\widetilde{s}, s \in \mathcal F(U)\}$. Together with the obvious restriction maps, it is a presheaf on $X$ isomorphic to $\mathcal F$

Now that we have as a presheaf of functions into $Et(\mathcal F)$, we can use Perrin's definition : $\widetilde {\mathcal F}^+(U)$ is the set of functions $U \to Et(\mathcal F)$ that are locally elements of $\widetilde {\mathcal F}(U)$ :

$\widetilde {\mathcal F}^+(U) = \{f : U \to Et(\mathcal F) / \forall x \in U, \exists g \in \widetilde {\mathcal F} (V), g = f|_V \}$ , where $V$ is an open containing $x$. $ = \{ f : U \to Et(\mathcal F) / \forall x \in U, \exists g \in \widetilde {\mathcal F} (V), f_x = g_x \} \\ = \{ f : U \to Et(\mathcal F) / \forall x \in U, \exists s \in \mathcal F (V), f_x = \widetilde{s}_x \} \\ = \{ f : U \to Et(\mathcal F) / \forall x \in U, \exists s \in \mathcal F (V), f(x) = s_x \}$
because the germ of a function into the etale space is determined by its image at that point, and $\widetilde{s}(x) = s_x$.

Thus the two definitions end up with the same sheaf in the end.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.