Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

For $X$ an affine variety and $p \in X$ define $T_p X = \mathrm{Der}(k[X], \mathrm{ev}_p)$.

Claim: If $Y = X \setminus Z(f)$ is some Zariski open affine subvariety of $X$ and $p \in Y$, then $T_p X \cong T_pY$.

Definition: Let $X$ be an arbitrary variety, $p \in X$. Define $T_p X = T_p U$ for any open affine neighbourhood $U$ of $p$.

Apparently the above claim tells us this definition makes sense, but I can't see why. I'd appreciate an explanation (note that I'm only really concerned with projective varieties, so if a simpler explanation can be afforded by restricting to this case then please do so!)


share|cite|improve this question
Let $U$ and $V$ be two open affine neighborhoods of $p$ ... and therefore $T_pU = T_pV$. – Hurkyl Jun 2 '12 at 10:55
@Hurkyl I must be missing something. Why? – Matt Jun 2 '12 at 11:02
Every open affine neighbourhood contains an open affine neighbourhood of that form. – Zhen Lin Jun 2 '12 at 12:22
Distinguished open subsets are a base for the Zariski topology. – Dylan Moreland Jun 2 '12 at 18:14

There are two typical topological ideas being used here.

The first is the idea of "localizing" at a point $P$ and performing a calculation $f(U)$ that involves an open neighborhood $U$ of $P$ that is independent of the choice of neighborhood. You can reduce the case of showing $f(U) = f(V)$ to the case of $V \subseteq U$, by the argument $f(U) = f(U \cap V) = f(V)$.

The second idea is that when you have a basis for a topology, you can typically rephrase any idea using open sets into one using the basis sets, because every open set is a union of basis sets.

The sets $D(f)$ (the complements of $Z(f)$) are a basis for the topology of an affine scheme.

$U$ and $V$ both contain a basis set $D(f)$ and $D(g)$, and the their intersection $D(fg)$ is a basis set contained in $U \cap V$. Therefore

$$ T_p U \cong T_p D(fg) \cong T_p V.$$

Incidentally, you really want to show a stronger claim: that the isomorphisms involved are 'coherent': e.g. that if you have a chain of inclusions $W \subseteq V \subseteq U$, that the isomorphisms

$$ T_p U \cong T_p V \cong T_p W $$

gives the same isomorphism as $T_p U \cong T_p W$ from invoking the theorem directly on $U$ and $W$. More precisely, you want to construct a functor between categories:

Open neighborhoods of p and inclusions --> Vector spaces and isomorphisms

If such a functor didn't exist, then even while the tangent space is well-defined as an abstract group, it would be rather difficult to actually use due to subtle technical issues.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.