Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

The Q-function is defined by : $$Q(x) =\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}} \int_{x}^{\infty}\exp(-\frac{u^2}{2}) \ \mathrm{d}u \ \ (1).$$

According to the wiki page there is an alternative form of the Q-function based on John W. Craig's work that is more useful is expressed as: $$Q(x) =\frac{1}{\pi} \int_{0}^{\frac{\pi}{2}}\exp\left(-\frac{x^2}{2\sin^2(\theta)}\right) \ \mathrm{d}\theta \ \ (2).$$

Craig's proove is based on probabilistic approach, there for I look for an analytic one.
any help will be appreciated.

Thanks.

share|improve this question
    
Thanks @DavideGiraudo for fixing it. –  jack May 27 '12 at 20:50
1  
here a way to solve this kaust.academia.edu/AhmadMawla/Papers/513176/Q-Function –  user33125 Jun 7 '12 at 0:46

1 Answer 1

up vote 4 down vote accepted

Since both expressions coincide at $x=0$, it suffices to show that their derivatives coincide on $x\geqslant0$. Since the derivative of the first expression of $Q(x)$ is proportional to $\mathrm e^{-x^2/2}$, this happens if $R(x)$ is constant on $x\geqslant0$, where $$ R(x)=\mathrm e^{x^2/2}\int_0^{\pi/2}\frac{x}{\sin^2\theta}\mathrm e^{-x^2/(2\sin^2\theta)}\mathrm d\theta=\int_0^{\pi/2}\frac{x}{\sin^2\theta}\mathrm e^{-x^2\cot^2\theta/2}\mathrm d\theta. $$ The change of variables $v=x\cot\theta$ yields the range $v\gt0$ and the Jacobian $\mathrm dv=x\mathrm d\theta/\sin^2\theta$, hence $$ R(x)=\int_0^{+\infty}\mathrm e^{-v^2/2}\mathrm dv, $$ which does not depend on $x$. QED.

share|improve this answer
1  
I am not sure that Craig's proof is based on a probabilistic approach. –  Did May 27 '12 at 21:19
    
Well Done @Didier, About the Craig's proof I refered to this [pdf document][1]. When I searching I found a book called : "Probability Distributions Involving Gaussian Random Variables" state that : <<The form in (l) is not readily obtainable by a change of variables directly in (2). However, by first extending (1) to two dimensions (x and y) where one of the dimensions (y) is integrated over the half plane, a change of variables from rectangular to polar coordinates readily produces (2).>> pg.123. If this is clear for you, how can be done? [1]:wsl.stanford.edu/~ee359/craig.pdf –  jack May 27 '12 at 22:29
    
Reference [1] is already in your post. As regards the other citation, its meaning is not clear to me at the moment. –  Did May 28 '12 at 0:25
    
Alright then, thanks anyway :) –  jack May 28 '12 at 0:41

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.