Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

If $E$ and $F$ are two normed vector spaces, $f:E\rightarrow F$ is a linear-continuous-bijective function. Then naturally I would think that $f^{-1}$ is also linear-continuous-bijective. But the textbook says that $f^{-1}$ can be non-continuous. I can't figure out why.

Can anyone raise a simple example?

share|cite|improve this question
Same strategy as in the previous: write down a bounded invertible operator whose inverse isn't bounded. – Qiaochu Yuan May 27 '12 at 5:16
My bad. Asking without thinking. So the critical problem I have here is my intuition is limited within the finite dimensional spaces, while things are much different in the infinite dimensional spaces. – Voldemort May 27 '12 at 5:26
The construction is very similar to the construction I used in your other question. Just think about it for a bit. I would recommend using the same normed spaces again or perhaps a slight modification. – Qiaochu Yuan May 27 '12 at 5:29
Thank you. I managed to construct an example. – Voldemort May 27 '12 at 5:31
up vote 2 down vote accepted

Let $E=F=c_{00}$ be the subspace of $\ell_\infty$ consisting of sequences with finite support. Consider the linear map $f:c_{00}\to c_{00}$ which sends $e_n\to \frac 1 n e_n$ where $\{e_n\}$ denotes the canonical basis.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.