Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I want to prove the following:

Let $A$ be a Boolean ring and let $\mathfrak{a}\neq A$ be an irreducible ideal. Then $\mathfrak{a}$ is maximal.

I already know that the prime ideals of $A$ are maximal and that $\mathfrak{a}$ is the intersection of the maximal ideals that contain $\mathfrak{a}$.

Suppose $\mathfrak{a}$ is not maximal and let $M$ be the set of maximal ideals containing $\mathfrak{a}$. I would like to find two subsets $R,S\subset M$ such that $\bigcap_{\mathfrak{m}\in R}\mathfrak{m}\neq\mathfrak{a}$, $\bigcap_{\mathfrak{m}\in S}\mathfrak{m}\neq\mathfrak{a}$ and $\bigcap_{\mathfrak{m}\in R\cup S}\mathfrak{m}=\mathfrak{a}$. But I'm not sure if this is possible, especially if $M$ is very large.

Can someone give me a hint?

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 5 down vote accepted

Taking by quotient, we may assume $\mathfrak{a}=0$ is irreducible. In a Boolean ring $A$, for any element $x$, $0=xA\cap (1-x)A$, thus $xA=0$ or $(1-x)A=0$. Thus $x=0$ or $x=1$, that is to say $A$ has only two elements, $A$ must be $\mathbb{F}_2$. We are done.

share|cite|improve this answer
This looks good, but at the moment I don't see why $xA\cap(1-x)A=0$. – Stefan Walter May 26 '12 at 18:04
@StefanWalter In general if $e$ is an idempotent in a ring $R$, $eR\cap(1-e)R=0$. To see this, suppose $er=(1-e)s$ is in the intersection. Then multiplying on the left with $e$, $er=e^2r=0s=0$. – rschwieb May 26 '12 at 18:38
@Stefan $ $ Hint $\rm\ \ I + J = 1\:\Rightarrow\: I\cap J = I\:\!J\:$ since $\rm\:(I+J)(I\cap J)\subseteq I\:\!J\subseteq I\cap J.\ $ **QED** $\ $ Now specialize $\rm\: I = xA,\ J = (1-x)A\:\Rightarrow\:I\:\!J = 0.$ $\ \ $ – Bill Dubuque May 26 '12 at 18:46
Thanks all three of you! – Stefan Walter May 26 '12 at 18:58
@Stefan Above is an ideal generalization of $\rm\:gcd(i,j) = 1\:\Rightarrow\:lcm(i,j) = i\:\!j.$ Indeed, this is simply the special principal ideal case $\rm\:I = (i), J = (j)\:$ in $\:\mathbb Z\:$ (or any PID/Bezout). – Bill Dubuque May 26 '12 at 19:09

It is well-known (and easy to prove) that $\mathrm{Spec}(A)$ is Hausdorff (in fact, a Stone space). Besides, $\mathfrak{a}$ is irreducible iff $V(\mathfrak{a})$ is irreducible (see Ted's comment; here we use that every ideal in a boolean ring is radical). The only irreducible Hausdorff space is a point. Points correspond to maximal ideals.

share|cite|improve this answer
Dear @Martin Brandenburg, It seems that it is not true for the statement "Besides, $\mathfrak{a}$ is irreducible iff $V(\mathfrak{a})$ is irreducible." in general, see… – wxu May 26 '12 at 17:21
In the ring $k[x,y]/(x^2,xy, y^2)=k[\xi, \eta]$, the ideal $(0)=(\xi)\cap (\eta)$ is reducible although $V(0)$ is irreducible.The statement "$\mathfrak{a}$ is irreducible iff $V(\mathfrak{a})$ is irreducible" in the answer is thus indeed false in general. – Georges Elencwajg May 26 '12 at 17:57
But it is true in a Boolean ring, since every ideal is its own radical. We have $V(a) = V(b)$ iff $\sqrt{a} = \sqrt{b}$ (in every ring) iff $a=b$ (in a Boolean ring). So $V$ is injective on ideals. So $a = b \cap c$ with $a \ne b,c$ iff $V(a) = V(b \cap c) = V(b) \cup V(c)$ with $V(a) \ne V(b), V(c)$. – Ted May 26 '12 at 19:02

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.