Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

If $X$ is a Tychonoff space and $\beta X$ is it's Stone-Cech compactification, should $X$ be a dense $G_\delta$ subset of $\beta X$?

share|improve this question
1  
This is one of the characterizations of Čech-complete spaces, about which you can read e.g. in Engelking's General Topology. A counterexample would be $\mathbb{Q}$ (Čech-complete spaces are Baire spaces, but $\mathbb{Q}$ isn't a Baire space). –  t.b. May 26 '12 at 15:35
    
I suppose that you mean $X$ being a dense $G_\delta$ subset of $\beta X$. –  Asaf Karagila May 26 '12 at 15:36
add comment

1 Answer

up vote 3 down vote accepted

We say that a Tychonoff space is Cech complete if and only if it is a dense $G_\delta$ subset of $\beta X$ if and only if $X$ is a $G_\delta$ of any compactification.

It is a nice exercise to see that for a metrizable space being Cech complete is equivalent to being completely metrizable.

From this one can take the counterexample of $\mathbb Q$, as t.b. suggests in the comments. This space is not completely metrizable and therefore not $G_\delta$ in $\beta X$.


Sketch of the proof for the equivalence for metric spaces:

First we prove the following lemmas:

  1. If $X$ is Hausdorff and $A\subseteq X$ is dense and homemorphic to a completely metrizable space then $A$ is a $G_\delta$ subset of $X$.

  2. If $X$ is completely metrizable and $Y\subseteq X$ then $Y$ is completely metrizable if and only if it is $G_\delta$ in $X$.

Now suppose that $X$ is completely metrizable, it is dense in $\beta X$ - which is Hausdorff. Therefore it is $G_\delta$ in $\beta X$ and therefore Cech-complete.

In the other direction, if $X$ is a metrizable Cech-complete space, consider $\widetilde{X}$ to be the metric completion of $X$ and $Y$ some compactification of $\widetilde{X}$. We have that $X$ is dense in $Y$ (dense subset of a dense subset). We have if so that $X$ is a $G_\delta$ subset of $\widetilde{X}$ and therefore by the second lemma - completely metrizable.

share|improve this answer
    
So, now I would like to add a question: If $X$ is a complete metric space, what can you tell about $\beta X$? Would it be metrizable? if so, would it be complete? –  user25640 May 26 '12 at 16:32
1  
@user25640: The compactification need not metrizable. If it is then it is a compact metric space and therefore complete and separable. –  Asaf Karagila May 26 '12 at 16:41
    
Also relevant: math.stackexchange.com/questions/62820/… –  Asaf Karagila May 26 '12 at 16:43
    
@user25640: Note that $\Bbb N$ with the discrete metric $d(m,n)=1$ if $m\ne n$ is a complete metric space, since the only Cauchy sequences are eventually constant, but $\beta\Bbb N$ fails miserably to be metrizable: it isn’t even first countable. –  Brian M. Scott May 27 '12 at 7:09
    
@user25640: This answer should have been accepted. –  daniel Jul 8 '12 at 13:56
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.