Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Let $X\subset \mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R},\mathbb{R})$ be the subset of bounded functions $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ such that are discontinuous in all points. Prove that $X$ is not open (with usual metric of supremum).

I think that I found an example of a function $f\in X$ such that for every $\epsilon>0$ there exist $g\in B(f,\epsilon)\cap X^c$.

Let $f$ defined by:

$$f(x)=\begin{cases} 1\ ; \text{if } x\in[-1,1]^c\cap\mathbb{Q}\\ x\ ; \text{if } x\in[-1,1]\cap\mathbb{Q}\setminus\{0\}\\ 1/2\ ; \text{if } x=0\\ -x\ ; \text{if } x\in[-1,1]\cap\mathbb{Q}^c\\ -1\ ; \text{if } x\in[-1,1]^c\cap\mathbb{Q}^c\\ \end{cases}$$

$f$ clearly be in $X$ and for each $\epsilon>0$ I can define $g$ by:

$$g(x)=\begin{cases} f(x)\ ; \text{if } x\in\{0\}\cup(-\epsilon,\epsilon)^c\\ 0\ ; \text{if } x\in(-\epsilon,\epsilon)\setminus\{0\}\\ \end{cases}$$

By a "draw" I think that $g\in B(f,1.1\epsilon)$ and $g$ is continuous in an interval then $g\in X^c$. Therefore $X$ is not open.

Am I right?

Do you know another way to prove this fact?

share|improve this question
    
Looks good to me, except I think you mean $g \in B(f, \epsilon)$, not $0.9\epsilon$. –  Nate Eldredge May 26 '12 at 1:30
    
@NateEldredge I think that you mean $g\in \overline{B(f,\epsilon)}$ not $g\in B(f,\epsilon)$. –  Gastón Burrull May 26 '12 at 1:32
    
Yes, you're right. –  Nate Eldredge May 26 '12 at 1:33
    
Oops I think that may be $1.1\epsilon$ indeed $0.9\epsilon$ –  Gastón Burrull May 26 '12 at 1:37

1 Answer 1

up vote 2 down vote accepted

Here’s a similar argument that I find a bit easier. Let $$f(x)=\begin{cases}\frac1{1+x^2},&\text{if }x\in\Bbb Q\\\\0,&\text{otherwise}\;.\end{cases}$$

For $a>0$ let $$f_a(x)=\begin{cases}f(x),&\text{if }|x|\le a\\\\0,&\text{otherwise}\;.\end{cases}$$

Clearly $f\in X$, each $f_a\in\mathcal{B}(\Bbb R,\Bbb R)\setminus X$ (since $f_a$ is continuous on $\Bbb R\setminus[-a,a]$), and

$$\|f-f_a\|=\frac1{1+a^2}$$ can be made arbitrarily small by taking $a$ large enough.

share|improve this answer
    
Really good example! is less artificial that taking $f(x)=+x$, and $f(x)=-x$ and forcing boundness by more cases. I liked. –  Gastón Burrull May 26 '12 at 3:12

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.